Axis Spatial

Search modelsMenu

ImpactMesh benchmark leaderboard

Wildfire and flood mapping from satellite images at four dates, from ImpactMesh. A standalone evaluation: its scores are shown here and on model pages, but it is not counted in any index or ranking until more models have run it.

Score

ImpactMesh score

Share of tasks passed, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

No data yet.

How to read this chart

What this metric means. The share of tasks the entry passed, 0 to 100.

Data table: ImpactMesh score
ImpactMesh score
ModelDeveloperImpactMesh score
Claude Sonnet 4.6 (high), Terminus-2AnthropicNo data
DeepSeek V4 Flash (max), Terminus-2DeepSeekNo data
DeepSeek V4 Flash (high), Terminus-2DeepSeekNo data
DeepSeek V4 Pro (max), Terminus-2DeepSeekNo data
DeepSeek V4 Pro (high), Terminus-2DeepSeekNo data
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), Terminus-2GoogleNo data
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (minimal), Terminus-2GoogleNo data
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (high), Terminus-2GoogleNo data
Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low), Terminus-2GoogleNo data
Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high), Terminus-2GoogleNo data
Gemini 3.8 Flash (high), Terminus-2GoogleNo data
Gemini 3.8 Flash (low), Terminus-2GoogleNo data
Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning), Terminus-2GoogleNo data
GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning), Terminus-2Z.aiNo data
GLM-5.2 (high), Terminus-2Z.aiNo data
GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning), Terminus-2Z.aiNo data
GLM-5.2 (max), Terminus-2Z.aiNo data
GLM-5.3-Flash (low), Terminus-2Z.aiNo data
GLM-5.3-Flash (max), Terminus-2Z.aiNo data
GLM-5.3 (low), Terminus-2Z.aiNo data
GLM-5.3 (max), Terminus-2Z.aiNo data
gpt-oss-120b (low), Terminus-2OpenAINo data
gpt-oss-120b (high), Terminus-2OpenAINo data
gpt-oss-20b (high), Terminus-2OpenAINo data
Kimi K2.6 (Reasoning), Terminus-2Moonshot AINo data
Kimi K2.7 Code (Reasoning), Terminus-2Moonshot AINo data
Kimi K3 (Reasoning), Terminus-2Moonshot AINo data
Llama 3.3 70B (Non-reasoning), Terminus-2MetaNo data
MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2MiniMaxNo data
Mistral Large 3 (Non-reasoning), Terminus-2Mistral AINo data
Mistral Large 4 (high), Terminus-2Mistral AINo data
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2NVIDIANo data
Nemotron 3 Ultra (high), Terminus-2NVIDIANo data
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2NVIDIANo data
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B (Reasoning), Terminus-2NVIDIANo data
Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh), Terminus-2Alibaba (Qwen)No data
Step 5 Preview (Reasoning), Terminus-2StepFunNo data
Claude Haiku 4.5 (Reasoning), Claude CodeAnthropicNo data
DeepSeek V4 Flash (high), Claude CodeDeepSeekNo data
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (max), Claude CodeDeepSeekNo data
GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning), Claude CodeZ.aiNo data
GLM-5.2 (max), Claude CodeZ.aiNo data
GLM-5.3-Flash (max), Claude CodeZ.aiNo data
GLM-5.3 (max), Claude CodeZ.aiNo data
DeepSeek V4 Flash (high), CodexDeepSeekNo data
DeepSeek V4 Pro (high), CodexDeepSeekNo data
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (max), CodexDeepSeekNo data
gpt-oss-120b (high), CodexOpenAINo data
gpt-oss-20b (high), CodexOpenAINo data
Kimi K2.6 (Reasoning), Kimi CodeMoonshot AINo data
Kimi K2.7 Code (Reasoning), Kimi CodeMoonshot AINo data
Kimi K3 (Reasoning), Kimi CodeMoonshot AINo data
MiniMax M3 (Reasoning), MiniMax CodeMiniMaxNo data
MiMo V2.6 Flash (Reasoning), MiMo CodeXiaomiNo data
Qwen 3.8 27B (Reasoning), Qwen CodeAlibaba (Qwen)No data
Claude Opus 5.5 (medium), Claude CodeAnthropicNo data
Claude Opus 5.5 (high), Claude CodeAnthropicNo data
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium), Claude CodeAnthropicNo data
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high), Claude CodeAnthropicNo data
Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium), Claude CodeAnthropicNo data
Claude Haiku 5.5 (high), Claude CodeAnthropicNo data
Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh), Claude CodeAnthropicNo data
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (xhigh), Claude CodeAnthropicNo data
Claude Haiku 5.5 (xhigh), Claude CodeAnthropicNo data
Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude CodeAnthropicNo data
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude CodeAnthropicNo data
Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude CodeAnthropicNo data
Claude Opus 5.5 (max), Claude CodeAnthropicNo data
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max), Claude CodeAnthropicNo data
Claude Haiku 5.5 (max), Claude CodeAnthropicNo data
Claude Opus 5 (high), Claude CodeAnthropicNo data
Claude Sonnet 5 (high), Claude CodeAnthropicNo data
Claude Opus 4.8 (high), Claude CodeAnthropicNo data
Claude Opus 4.7 (high), Claude CodeAnthropicNo data
GPT-6.1 Sol (medium), CodexOpenAINo data
GPT-6.1 Sol (high), CodexOpenAINo data
GPT-6.1 Sol (xhigh), CodexOpenAINo data
GPT-6 Luna (xhigh), CodexOpenAINo data
GPT-6 Sol (medium), CodexOpenAINo data
GPT-6 Sol (high), CodexOpenAINo data
GPT-6 Luna (medium), CodexOpenAINo data
GPT-6 Luna (high), CodexOpenAINo data
GPT-5.6 Sol (medium), CodexOpenAINo data
GPT-5.6 Sol (high), CodexOpenAINo data
GPT-5.6 Terra (high), CodexOpenAINo data
GPT-5.6 Luna (medium), CodexOpenAINo data
GPT-5.6 Luna (high), CodexOpenAINo data
GPT-5.6 Luna (xhigh), CodexOpenAINo data
GPT-6 Luna (low), CodexOpenAINo data
GPT-5.6 Luna (low), CodexOpenAINo data

Background

ImpactMesh pairs Sentinel-2 optical and Sentinel-1 radar images, taken at four dates around a wildfire or a flood, with the burn scars and flood extents mapped by the Copernicus Emergency Management Service. Here the agent gets one 7.68 km scene of an event and works out the burned or flooded area, measures the change between two dates by a procedure the task sets out, or draws the burn scar or flood as a map.

We run a small slice: 12 tasks on four scenes from the dataset's test split, two wildfires and two floods. Ten of the candidate events we checked were left out: five whose images were taken on different dates across the scene, and five where a standard burn index or radar water method cannot reproduce the emergency map from these images. So this set is easier than ImpactMesh as a whole.

Licence: dataset CC BY 4.0; contains modified Copernicus Sentinel data, Copernicus DEM (© DLR e.V. and Airbus) and Copernicus Emergency Management Service maps (© European Union).

Published by IBM, DLR and ESA Φ-lab.

Related links

Explore evaluations