Axis Spatial

Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (low) vs. Terminus-2 – Gemma 4 26B A4B (thinking on): geospatial agent comparison

Comparison between Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (low) and Terminus-2 – Gemma 4 26B A4B (thinking on) on the Geospatial Agent Index, each benchmark, cost, time and token use, from the same tasks, agent and limits. Methodology.

Side by side

Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (low) vs. Terminus-2 – Gemma 4 26B A4B (thinking on)
MetricTerminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (low)Terminus-2 – Gemma 4 26B A4B (thinking on)
Geospatial Agent Index64* (attempts per task: 2.9)56* (attempts per task: 3.7)
GeoAgentBench score9682
GeoBenchX score6149
Earth-Bench score3729
GeoAnalystBench score6363
Raster and remote sensing score6241
Vector and overlay score6378
Networks and routing score100100
Climate and time series score5135
Spatial statistics and interpolation score4342
Mapping and cartography score5357
Recognising infeasible requests score8347
Cost per task$0.115$0.017
Time per task2.7 min9.3 min
Tokens per attempt314k134k
Turns per attempt17.910.1
Attempts decided833516
Input price per 1M tokens$0.75$0.10
Output price per 1M tokens$3.75$0.30
Context window1,048,576256,000
Image inputYesYes
DeveloperGoogleGoogle

Charts

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal-weight average of the evaluation scores, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

  • Partial coverage
Geospatial Agent IndexTerminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (low): 64* (partial coverage); Terminus-2 – Gemma 4 26B A4B (thinking on): 56* (partial coverage)025507510064*Gemini 3.8 Flash (low)56*Gemma 4 26B A4B (thinking on)
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
Geospatial Agent Index
ModelCreatorGeospatial Agent IndexRange while attempts are pendingBenchmarks coveredCoverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (low)Google64* (attempts per task: 2.9)No pending judgements; coverage incomplete4 of 4833 of 1,167 planned attempts (74 excluded)
Terminus-2 – Gemma 4 26B A4B (thinking on)Google56* (attempts per task: 3.7)22 to 774 of 4516 of 1,167 planned attempts

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

  • Partial coverage
Cost per taskTerminus-2 – Gemma 4 26B A4B (thinking on): $0.017 (partial coverage); Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (low): $0.115 (partial coverage)$0$0.030$0.060$0.090$0.120$0.017Gemma 4 26B A4B (thinking on)$0.115Gemini 3.8 Flash (low)
Data table: Cost per task
Cost per task
ModelCreatorCost per taskCoverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (low)Google$0.115833 of 1,167 planned attempts (74 excluded)
Terminus-2 – Gemma 4 26B A4B (thinking on)Google$0.0171,083 of 1,167 planned attempts

Time per task

Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better

  • Partial coverage
Time per taskTerminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (low): 2.7 min (partial coverage); Terminus-2 – Gemma 4 26B A4B (thinking on): 9.3 min (partial coverage)0m2m5m8m10m2.7 minGemini 3.8 Flash (low)9.3 minGemma 4 26B A4B (thinking on)
Data table: Time per task
Time per task
ModelCreatorTime per taskCoverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (low)Google2.7 min833 of 1,167 planned attempts (74 excluded)
Terminus-2 – Gemma 4 26B A4B (thinking on)Google9.3 min1,083 of 1,167 planned attempts

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (low) or Terminus-2 – Gemma 4 26B A4B (thinking on)?
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (low), at 64 against 56 for Terminus-2 – Gemma 4 26B A4B (thinking on). Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (low): 833 of 1,167 planned attempts (74 excluded). Terminus-2 – Gemma 4 26B A4B (thinking on): 516 of 1,167 planned attempts. Coverage is partial; scores can change as more attempts are decided.
Which is cheaper per task, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (low) or Terminus-2 – Gemma 4 26B A4B (thinking on)?
Terminus-2 – Gemma 4 26B A4B (thinking on), at $0.017 against $0.115 for Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (low).
Which is faster per task, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (low) or Terminus-2 – Gemma 4 26B A4B (thinking on)?
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (low), at 2.7 min against 9.3 min for Terminus-2 – Gemma 4 26B A4B (thinking on).
Which has the larger context window, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (low) or Terminus-2 – Gemma 4 26B A4B (thinking on)?
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (low), at 1,048,576 tokens against 256,000 tokens for Terminus-2 – Gemma 4 26B A4B (thinking on).

More: Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (low) · Terminus-2 – Gemma 4 26B A4B (thinking on) · all comparisons