Axis Spatial

Search modelsMenu

Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash (high)

Results updated 30 October 2026 · In Terminus-2 and Claude Code, so part of any gap can come from the harness · How we benchmark

Verdict

Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low)Not yet rankedno GS-QA2 score yet
DeepSeek V4 Flash (high)56Geospatial Agent Index · rank 60 of 78

Not comparable yet: Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low) is not yet ranked.

Cost per task
$0.057 vs $0.080
Time per task
0.5 min vs 5.4 min
Tokens per attempt
19k vs 634k
Image input
Yes vs No

Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low), Terminus-2 scores higher on GeoBenchX; DeepSeek V4 Flash (high), Claude Code scores higher on Earth-Bench V2. Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low), Terminus-2 is cheaper and faster: $0.057 against $0.080 per task, and 0.5 min against 5.4 min.

Not yet ranked. Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low), Terminus-2: no GS-QA2 score yet. Not in the Agent Index, cost and time charts until it has a score on every index evaluation. Results so far are in the side-by-side table.

Where they differ most

By kind of work, share of tasks passed, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

Kind of workGemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low)DeepSeek V4 Flash (high)
Recognising infeasible requests9335
GIS analysis8062
Remote sensing and raster analysis5567
Making maps6068
World map of the places the tasks are setWhere the tasks are set: each kind of work links to its tasks and scores
Leaderboard

Charts for each: Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low), Terminus-2 · DeepSeek V4 Flash (high), Claude Code.

Side by side

Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low), Terminus-2 vs. DeepSeek V4 Flash (high), Claude Code
MetricGemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low), Terminus-2DeepSeek V4 Flash (high), Claude Code
Geospatial Agent Index: Text only5756
Geospatial Agent Index: Text + visionNo dataNo image input
Earth-Bench V2 score4150
GeoBenchX score7450
GS-QA2 scoreNo data69
Vision agents scoreNo dataNo image input
GeoAgentBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)8484
GeoAnalystBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)7989
OGD4All score (standalone; in no index)No data70
GeoNatureAgent score (standalone; in no index)No data71
MultiGlobeQA score (standalone; in no index)No data64
GeoAgentEval score (standalone; in no index)No data80
Remote sensing and raster analysis score5567
GIS analysis score8062
Climate and time series score4553
Spatial statistics score4638
Making maps score6068
Recognising infeasible requests score9335
Cost per task$0.057$0.080
Time per task (at 100 output tokens/s)0.5 min5.4 min
Tokens per attempt19k634k
Turns per attempt3.616.1
Input price per 1M tokens$2.00$0.44
Output price per 1M tokens$12.00$1.32
Context window1,048,5761,048,576
Image inputYesNo
DeveloperGoogleDeepSeek

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low), Terminus-2 or DeepSeek V4 Flash (high), Claude Code?
Not comparable yet: Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low), Terminus-2 is not yet ranked (no GS-QA2 score yet).
Which is cheaper per task, Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low), Terminus-2 or DeepSeek V4 Flash (high), Claude Code?
Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low), Terminus-2, $0.057 to $0.080.
Which writes fewer output tokens per task, Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low), Terminus-2 or DeepSeek V4 Flash (high), Claude Code?
Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low), Terminus-2, 2k to 19k.
Which has the larger context window, Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low), Terminus-2 or DeepSeek V4 Flash (high), Claude Code?
They are level, at 1,048,576 tokens.