Axis Spatial

Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (high) vs. Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low): geospatial agent comparison

Comparison between Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (high) and Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low) on the Geospatial Agent Index, each benchmark, cost, time and token use, from the same tasks, agent and limits. Methodology.

Side by side

Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (high) vs. Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low)
MetricTerminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (high)Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low)
Geospatial Agent Index59* (attempts per task: 3)65 (attempts per task: 3)
GeoAgentBench score6983
GeoBenchX score5361
Earth-Bench score4342
GeoAnalystBench score7075
Raster and remote sensing score5458
Vector and overlay score6569
Networks and routing score6093
Climate and time series score5767
Spatial statistics and interpolation score4651
Mapping and cartography score6655
Recognising infeasible requests score4871
Cost per task$0.021$0.061
Time per task1.9 min1.0 min
Tokens per attempt52k19k
Turns per attempt5.93.8
Attempts decided864870
Input price per 1M tokens$0.25$2.00
Output price per 1M tokens$1.50$12.00
Context window1,048,5761,048,576
Image inputYesYes
DeveloperGoogleGoogle

Charts

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal-weight average of the evaluation scores, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

  • Partial coverage
Geospatial Agent IndexTerminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low): 65; Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (high): 59* (partial coverage)025507510065Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low)59*Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (high)
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
Geospatial Agent Index
ModelCreatorGeospatial Agent IndexRange while attempts are pendingBenchmarks coveredCoverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low)Google65 (attempts per task: 3)No pending judgements4 of 4870 of 870 planned attempts (22 excluded)
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (high)Google59* (attempts per task: 3)59 to 594 of 4864 of 870 planned attempts (6 excluded)

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

  • Partial coverage
Cost per taskTerminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (high): $0.021 (partial coverage); Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low): $0.061$0$0.020$0.040$0.060$0.080$0.021Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (high)$0.061Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low)
Data table: Cost per task
Cost per task
ModelCreatorCost per taskCoverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (high)Google$0.021865 of 870 planned attempts (6 excluded)
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low)Google$0.061870 of 870 planned attempts (22 excluded)

Time per task

Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better

  • Partial coverage
Time per taskTerminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low): 1.0 min; Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (high): 1.9 min (partial coverage)0m0m1m2m2m1.0 minGemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low)1.9 minGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (high)
Data table: Time per task
Time per task
ModelCreatorTime per taskCoverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (high)Google1.9 min865 of 870 planned attempts (6 excluded)
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low)Google1.0 min870 of 870 planned attempts (22 excluded)

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (high) or Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low)?
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low), at 65 against 59 for Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (high). Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (high): 864 of 870 planned attempts (6 excluded). Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low): 870 of 870 planned attempts (22 excluded). Coverage is partial; scores can change as more attempts are decided.
Which is cheaper per task, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (high) or Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low)?
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (high), at $0.021 against $0.061 for Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low).
Which is faster per task, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (high) or Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low)?
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low), at 1.0 min against 1.9 min for Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (high).
Which has the larger context window, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (high) or Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low)?
They are level, at 1,048,576 tokens.

More: Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (high) · Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low) · all comparisons