Axis Spatial

Search modelsMenu

Mistral AI: geospatial agent results

Helps you choose the best Mistral AI model for geospatial work: GIS and Earth observation agent tasks, vision and knowledge, with cost and time.

Overview

Most intelligent

  1. #1Mistral Large 3 (Non-reasoning) Open weights44

Geospatial Intelligence Index, Text only

Lowest cost

  1. #1Mistral Large 3 (Non-reasoning), Terminus-2$0.026

Cost per agent task, at list prices

Fastest

  1. #1Mistral Large 3 (Non-reasoning), Terminus-21.1 min

Time per agent task, at 100 output tokens/s

  • For intelligence, the top Mistral AI models are Mistral Large 3 (Non-reasoning) (44) on the Geospatial Intelligence Index (Text only).
  • For cost, the cheapest per agent task are Mistral Large 3 (Non-reasoning) ($0.026).
  • For speed, the fastest per agent task are Mistral Large 3 (Non-reasoning) (1.1 min).
  • For context window, the largest are Mistral Large 3: 256K tokens.

Intelligence

Geospatial Intelligence Index, Text only · Higher is better

IntelligenceScores 0 to 100: Mistral Large 3 (Non-reasoning): 44025507510044Mistral Large3(Non-reasoning)
Data table: Intelligence
Intelligence
ModelDeveloperIntelligence
Mistral Large 3 (Non-reasoning)Mistral AI44

Cost per task

USD per agent task · Lower is better

Cost per taskCost per task in US dollars: Mistral Large 3 (Non-reasoning), Terminus-2: $0.026$0$0.01$0.02$0.03$0.04$0.026Mistral Large3(Non-reasoning)Terminus-2
Data table: Cost per task
Cost per task
ModelDeveloperCost per task
Mistral Large 3 (Non-reasoning), Terminus-2Mistral AI$0.026

Time per task

Minutes per agent task · Lower is better

Time per taskTime per task: Mistral Large 3 (Non-reasoning), Terminus-2: 1.1 min00.511.521.1 minMistral Large3(Non-reasoning)Terminus-2
Data table: Time per task
Time per task
ModelDeveloperTime per task (at 100 output tokens/s)
Mistral Large 3 (Non-reasoning), Terminus-2Mistral AI1.1 min

Models

Mistral Large 3

Open weightsReads images

256K token context · Released 2 December 2025

$0.50 input · $1.50 output per 1M tokens

Intelligence

Text only

Geospatial Intelligence Index: Text only

Weighted average of agent tasks, guided workflows and geospatial knowledge, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

Geospatial Intelligence Index: Text onlyScores 0 to 100: Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh): 89; GPT-6.1 Sol (medium): 86; DeepSeek V4 Pro (max): 79; Mistral Large 3 (Non-reasoning): 440255075100Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh)89GPT-6.1 Sol (medium)86DeepSeek V4 Pro (max)79Mistral Large 3 (Non-reasoning)44
How to read this chart

What this metric means. A weighted average of group scores, each 0 to 100: Agent tasks 4/6, Guided workflows 1/6, Geospatial knowledge 1/6.

Bars. Every Mistral AI model with a result, highlighted, and the strongest models from other labs, faded, for context. Provisional: not yet ranked.

Data table: Geospatial Intelligence Index: Text only
Geospatial Intelligence Index: Text only
ModelDeveloperGeospatial Intelligence Index: Text only
Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh)Anthropic89
GPT-6.1 Sol (medium)OpenAI86
DeepSeek V4 Pro (max)DeepSeek79
Mistral Large 3 (Non-reasoning)Mistral AI44

Text + vision

No Mistral AI model has a Text + vision score yet: that view also needs Vision agents and Vision results.

Provisional, so not on these charts: Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning). Their finished evaluations are in the charts below.

Agent tasks

Text only

Geospatial Agent Index: Text only

Equal average of Earth-Bench V2, GeoBenchX and GS-QA2, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

Geospatial Agent Index: Text onlyScores 0 to 100: Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh), Claude Code: 85; GPT-6.1 Sol (xhigh), Codex: 82; GLM-5.3 (max), Claude Code: 73; Mistral Large 3 (Non-reasoning), Terminus-2: 330255075100Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh)Claude Code85GPT-6.1 Sol (xhigh)Codex82GLM-5.3 (max)Claude Code73Mistral Large 3 (Non-reasoning)Terminus-233
How to read this chart

Bars. Every Mistral AI model with a result, highlighted, and the strongest models from other labs, faded, for context. Provisional: not yet ranked.

Data table: Geospatial Agent Index: Text only
Geospatial Agent Index: Text only
ModelDeveloperGeospatial Agent Index: Text only
Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh), Claude CodeAnthropic85
GPT-6.1 Sol (xhigh), CodexOpenAI82
GLM-5.3 (max), Claude CodeZ.ai73
Mistral Large 3 (Non-reasoning), Terminus-2Mistral AI33

Text + vision

No Mistral AI model has a Text + vision score yet: that view also needs Vision agents and Vision results.

Earth-Bench V2

Earth observation data analysis · 0 to 100 · Higher is better

Earth-Bench V2Scores 0 to 100: Claude Opus 5.5 (high), Claude Code: 79; GPT-6 Sol (high), Codex: 75; Mistral Large 3 (Non-reasoning), Terminus-2: 31025507510079Claude Opus5.5 (high)Claude Code75GPT-6 Sol(high)Codex31Mistral Large3(Non-reasoning)Terminus-2
Data table: Earth-Bench V2
Earth-Bench V2
ModelDeveloperEarth-Bench V2
Claude Opus 5.5 (high), Claude CodeAnthropic79
GPT-6 Sol (high), CodexOpenAI75
Mistral Large 3 (Non-reasoning), Terminus-2Mistral AI31

GeoBenchX

Maps, numbers and lists from country and city data; some tasks should be declined · 0 to 100 · Higher is better

GeoBenchXScores 0 to 100: Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh), Claude Code: 83; GPT-6.1 Sol (medium), Codex: 79; Mistral Large 3 (Non-reasoning), Terminus-2: 29025507510083Claude Opus5.5 (xhigh)Claude Code79GPT-6.1 Sol(medium)Codex29Mistral Large3(Non-reasoning)Terminus-2
Data table: GeoBenchX

GS-QA2

Spatial data reasoning over map and elevation data · 0 to 100 · Higher is better

GS-QA2Scores 0 to 100: Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh), Claude Code: 94; GPT-6.1 Sol (xhigh), Codex: 94; Mistral Large 3 (Non-reasoning), Terminus-2: 39025507510094Claude Opus5.5 (xhigh)Claude Code94GPT-6.1 Sol(xhigh)Codex39Mistral Large3(Non-reasoning)Terminus-2
Data table: GS-QA2

GeoAgentBench

Guided workflows: multi-step spatial execution · 0 to 100 · Higher is better

GeoAgentBenchScores 0 to 100: Claude Opus 5.5 (high), Claude Code: 100; GPT-6.1 Sol (medium), Codex: 100; Mistral Large 3 (Non-reasoning), Terminus-2: 460255075100100Claude Opus5.5 (high)Claude Code100GPT-6.1 Sol(medium)Codex46Mistral Large3(Non-reasoning)Terminus-2
Data table: GeoAgentBench
GeoAgentBench
ModelDeveloperGeoAgentBench
Claude Opus 5.5 (high), Claude CodeAnthropic100
GPT-6.1 Sol (medium), CodexOpenAI100
Mistral Large 3 (Non-reasoning), Terminus-2Mistral AI46

GeoAnalystBench

Guided workflows: spatial workflow and code generation · 0 to 100 · Higher is better

GeoAnalystBenchScores 0 to 100: DeepSeek V4 Pro (max), Terminus-2: 100; GLM-5.2 (high), Terminus-2: 100; Mistral Large 3 (Non-reasoning), Terminus-2: 470255075100100DeepSeek V4Pro (max)Terminus-2100GLM-5.2(high)Terminus-247Mistral Large3(Non-reasoning)Terminus-2
Data table: GeoAnalystBench
GeoAnalystBench
ModelDeveloperGeoAnalystBench
DeepSeek V4 Pro (max), Terminus-2DeepSeek100
GLM-5.2 (high), Terminus-2Z.ai100
Mistral Large 3 (Non-reasoning), Terminus-2Mistral AI47

Vision

Earth-Bench V2 images

Questions on images, no tools · 0 to 100 · Higher is better

Earth-Bench V2 imagesScores 0 to 100: GPT-5.6 Sol (high): 76; Claude Opus 5.5 (high): 74; Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning): 54; Mistral Large 3 (Non-reasoning): 520255075100GPT-5.6 Sol (high)76Claude Opus 5.5 (high)74Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning)54Mistral Large 3 (Non-reasoning)52
Data table: Earth-Bench V2 images
Earth-Bench V2 images
ModelDeveloperEarth-Bench V2 images
GPT-5.6 Sol (high)OpenAI76
Claude Opus 5.5 (high)Anthropic74
Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning)Mistral AI54
Mistral Large 3 (Non-reasoning)Mistral AI52

ThinkGeo images

Questions on images, no tools · 0 to 100 · Higher is better

ThinkGeo imagesScores 0 to 100: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high): 50; GPT-6 Luna (high): 43; Mistral Large 3 (Non-reasoning): 15; Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning): 120255075100Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high)50GPT-6 Luna (high)43Mistral Large 3 (Non-reasoning)15Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning)12
Data table: ThinkGeo images
ThinkGeo images
ModelDeveloperThinkGeo images
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high)Anthropic50
GPT-6 Luna (high)OpenAI43
Mistral Large 3 (Non-reasoning)Mistral AI15
Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning)Mistral AI12

Knowledge

Geospatial knowledge

Questions on geospatial knowledge · 0 to 100 · Higher is better

Geospatial knowledgeScores 0 to 100: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (high): 98; Gemini 3.8 Flash (low): 94; Mistral Large 3 (Non-reasoning): 89; Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning): 820255075100Claude Sonnet 4.6 (high)98Gemini 3.8 Flash (low)94Mistral Large 3 (Non-reasoning)89Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning)82
Data table: Geospatial knowledge
Geospatial knowledge
ModelDeveloperGeospatial knowledge
Claude Sonnet 4.6 (high)Anthropic98
Gemini 3.8 Flash (low)Google94
Mistral Large 3 (Non-reasoning)Mistral AI89
Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning)Mistral AI82

Cost

Cost per task

Average cost per agent task (USD) · Lower is better

Cost per taskCost per task in US dollars: Mistral Large 3 (Non-reasoning), Terminus-2: $0.026; GPT-6.1 Sol (xhigh), Codex: $0.085; Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh), Claude Code: $0.25$0$0.10$0.20$0.30$0.40$0.026Mistral Large3(Non-reasoning)Terminus-2$0.085GPT-6.1 Sol(xhigh)Codex$0.25Claude Opus5.5 (xhigh)Claude Code
How to read this chart

What cost is measuring. What one attempt at a task would cost if paid token by token at the provider's published API prices, averaged over attempts: ordinary input tokens, input tokens served from the provider's cache at the lower cached price, tokens written to the cache where the provider charges for that, and output tokens (thinking included). Cost assumes each harness uses the model's pay-per-token API, priced at public list rates; sandboxes and our own engineering time are not included. Failed attempts count too.

How to read this chart. Lower is better. Costs are pay-per-token list prices, not any discount or credit a customer might have.

Bars. Every Mistral AI entry with a cost, highlighted, and the top-ranked entries from other labs on the Geospatial Agent Index, faded, for context. Provisional: not yet ranked.

Data table: Cost per task
Cost per task
ModelDeveloperCost per task
Mistral Large 3 (Non-reasoning), Terminus-2Mistral AI$0.026
GPT-6.1 Sol (xhigh), CodexOpenAI$0.085
Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh), Claude CodeAnthropic$0.25

Geospatial Agent Index vs. cost per task

Geospatial Agent Index, Text only; cost per task (USD) · Higher and further left is better

  • Most attractive quadrant
  • Pareto line
Geospatial Agent Index vs. cost per taskGeospatial Agent Index (0 to 100) against cost per task in US dollars, log scale: Mistral Large 3 (Non-reasoning), Terminus-2: 32.89, $0.026; Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh), Claude Code: 84.65, $0.25; GPT-6.1 Sol (xhigh), Codex: 81.82, $0.085; GLM-5.3 (max), Claude Code: 73.4, $0.48Most attractive quadrant2030405060708090$0.02$0.05$0.10$0.20$0.50$1.00Cost per task (USD, log scale)Geospatial Agent IndexMistral Large 3 (Non-reasoning), Terminus-2Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh), Claude CodeGPT-6.1 Sol (xhigh), CodexGLM-5.3 (max), Claude Code
How to read this chart

Why a log scale. Costs and times differ by a factor of ten or more between models, so equal steps on the axis are equal ratios.

What cost is measuring. What one attempt at a task would cost if paid token by token at the provider's published API prices, averaged over attempts: ordinary input tokens, input tokens served from the provider's cache at the lower cached price, tokens written to the cache where the provider charges for that, and output tokens (thinking included). Cost assumes each harness uses the model's pay-per-token API, priced at public list rates; sandboxes and our own engineering time are not included. Failed attempts count too.

How to read this chart. Each point is one entry. Further left means a lower average cost per task (log scale); higher means a higher Geospatial Agent Index. Both axes fit the models shown, so the score axis does not start at zero. The shaded most attractive quadrant is the top-left quarter of the plot, split at the middle of each axis: a reading aid that moves with the axes when you change the models shown, not a fixed bar. The dotted Pareto line joins the shown models that no cheaper shown model beats on score.

Data table: Geospatial Agent Index vs. cost per task
Geospatial Agent Index vs. cost per task
ModelGeospatial Agent IndexCost per task (USD)On the Pareto line
Mistral Large 3 (Non-reasoning), Terminus-233$0.026Yes
Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh), Claude Code85$0.25Yes
GPT-6.1 Sol (xhigh), Codex82$0.085Yes
GLM-5.3 (max), Claude Code73$0.48No

Time

Time per task

Average minutes per agent task, at 100 output tokens/s · Lower is better

Time per taskTime per task: GPT-6.1 Sol (xhigh), Codex: 0.8 min; Mistral Large 3 (Non-reasoning), Terminus-2: 1.1 min; Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh), Claude Code: 1.4 min00.511.520.8 minGPT-6.1 Sol(xhigh)Codex1.1 minMistral Large3(Non-reasoning)Terminus-21.4 minClaude Opus5.5 (xhigh)Claude Code
How to read this chart

What this metric means. Time as if every model wrote 100 output tokens per second: output tokens divided by 100, plus the time the agent's commands took. Serving speed differs between providers and is not ranked.

Bars. Every Mistral AI entry with a cost, highlighted, and the top-ranked entries from other labs on the Geospatial Agent Index, faded, for context. Provisional: not yet ranked.

Data table: Time per task
Time per task
ModelDeveloperTime per task (at 100 output tokens/s)
GPT-6.1 Sol (xhigh), CodexOpenAI0.8 min
Mistral Large 3 (Non-reasoning), Terminus-2Mistral AI1.1 min
Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh), Claude CodeAnthropic1.4 min

Geospatial Agent Index vs. time per task

Geospatial Agent Index, Text only; time per task (minutes) · Higher and further left is better

  • Most attractive quadrant
  • Pareto line
Geospatial Agent Index vs. time per taskGeospatial Agent Index (0 to 100) against time per task (minutes), log scale: Mistral Large 3 (Non-reasoning), Terminus-2: 32.89, 1.1 min; Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh), Claude Code: 84.65, 1.4 min; GPT-6.1 Sol (xhigh), Codex: 81.82, 0.8 min; GLM-5.3 (max), Claude Code: 73.4, 4.3 minMost attractive quadrant20304050607080900.5 min1 min2 min5 minTime per task (minutes, log scale)Geospatial Agent IndexMistral Large 3 (Non-reasoning), Terminus-2Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh), Claude CodeGPT-6.1 Sol (xhigh), CodexGLM-5.3 (max), Claude Code
How to read this chart

Why a log scale. Costs and times differ by a factor of ten or more between models, so equal steps on the axis are equal ratios.

What this metric means. Time as if every model wrote 100 output tokens per second: output tokens divided by 100, plus the time the agent's commands took. Serving speed differs between providers and is not ranked.

How to read this chart. Each point is one entry. Further left means a lower average time per task (log scale); higher means a higher Geospatial Agent Index. Both axes fit the models shown, so the score axis does not start at zero. The shaded most attractive quadrant is the top-left quarter of the plot, split at the middle of each axis: a reading aid that moves with the axes when you change the models shown, not a fixed bar. The dotted Pareto line joins the shown models that no faster shown model beats on score.

Data table: Geospatial Agent Index vs. time per task
Geospatial Agent Index vs. time per task
ModelGeospatial Agent IndexTime per task (minutes)On the Pareto line
Mistral Large 3 (Non-reasoning), Terminus-2331.1 minNo
Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh), Claude Code851.4 minYes
GPT-6.1 Sol (xhigh), Codex820.8 minYes
GLM-5.3 (max), Claude Code734.3 minNo

Every benchmark

Score by benchmark

Share answered correctly, 0 to 100 · Darker is better; hatched: provisional, evaluation not finished

Data table: Score by benchmark
Every benchmark
ModelStatusEarth-Bench V2GeoBenchXGS-QA2GeoAgentBenchGeoAnalystBenchEarth-Bench V2 imagesThinkGeo imagesGeospatial knowledge
Mistral Large 3 (Non-reasoning), Terminus-2Ranked3129394647521589

Frequently asked questions

What Mistral AI models do you benchmark?
We benchmark 1 Mistral AI model: Mistral Large 3.
Which is the most intelligent Mistral AI model for geospatial work?
Mistral Large 3 (Non-reasoning), with 44.5 on the Geospatial Intelligence Index (Text only), #55 of 61.
What is the cheapest Mistral AI model per task?
Mistral Large 3 (Non-reasoning), Terminus-2, at $0.026 per agent task at list prices, #22 of 74 on the Geospatial Agent Index.
What is the fastest Mistral AI model?
Mistral Large 3 (Non-reasoning), Terminus-2, at 1.1 min per agent task at 100 output tokens per second, #25 of 74.
Does Mistral AI offer open-weights models?
Yes: Mistral Large 3. Their weights are published, so you can run them on your own hardware.
Which Mistral AI models can read satellite imagery?
Mistral Large 3 takes images as input. The best on Vision is Mistral Large 3 (Non-reasoning), with 33.3.
How do Mistral AI models do on Earth observation, GIS and geospatial knowledge?
Which Mistral AI model is best for agent work, and in which harness?
Mistral Large 3 (Non-reasoning), Terminus-2, with 32.9 on the Geospatial Agent Index, #68 of 74, in the Terminus-2 harness.
How does Mistral AI's best model compare with the overall leader?
Mistral Large 3 (Non-reasoning) scores 44.5 on the Geospatial Intelligence Index (Text only), 44.2 points behind the leader, Anthropic's Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh), with 88.7.
Are any Mistral AI models still being benchmarked?
No. Every Mistral AI model listed has finished its benchmark and is ranked.
How should I choose between Mistral AI models for geospatial work?
Start from the job. For the strongest answers, Mistral Large 3 (Non-reasoning); for agent work with data and code, Mistral Large 3 (Non-reasoning), Terminus-2; for the lowest cost, Mistral Large 3 (Non-reasoning), Terminus-2; for reading imagery, Mistral Large 3 (Non-reasoning); to run it yourself, Mistral Large 3. Each model page shows its scores on every evaluation.