Axis Spatial

Nemotron 3 Ultra (high), Terminus-2 vs. Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh), Terminus-2

Nemotron 3 Ultra (high), Terminus-2 against Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh), Terminus-2: Geospatial Agent Index, each evaluation, cost, time and tokens, on the same tasks and limits. Methodology.

Side by side

Nemotron 3 Ultra (high), Terminus-2 vs. Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh), Terminus-2
MetricNemotron 3 Ultra (high), Terminus-2Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh), Terminus-2
Geospatial Agent Index: Text only6861
Geospatial Agent Index: Text + visionNo dataNo data
Earth-Bench V2 score6844
GeoBenchX score6566
GS-QA2 score7074
Vision agents scoreNo dataNo data
GeoAgentBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)9660
GeoAnalystBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)6389
OGD4All score (standalone; in no index)No dataNo data
GeoNatureAgent score (standalone; in no index)No dataNo data
MultiGlobeQA score (standalone; in no index)No dataNo data
GeoAgentEval score (standalone; in no index)No dataNo data
Remote sensing and raster analysis score7064
GIS analysis score7077
Climate and time series score6842
Spatial statistics score3169
Making maps score7068
Recognising infeasible requests score6857
Cost per task$0.069$0.10
Time per task (at 100 output tokens/s)2.4 min7.3 min
Tokens per attempt148k335k
Turns per attempt12.114.8
Input price per 1M tokens$0.50$0.45
Output price per 1M tokens$2.20$3.20
Context window262,144262,144
Image inputNoYes
DeveloperNVIDIAAlibaba (Qwen)

Charts

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal average of Earth-Bench V2, GeoBenchX and GS-QA2, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

Geospatial Agent IndexScores 0 to 100: Nemotron 3 Ultra (high), Terminus-2: 68; Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh), Terminus-2: 61025507510068Nemotron 3 Ultra (high)61Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh)
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
Geospatial Agent Index
ModelDeveloperGeospatial Agent Index
Nemotron 3 Ultra (high), Terminus-2NVIDIA68
Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh), Terminus-2Alibaba (Qwen)61

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

Cost per taskCost per task in US dollars: Nemotron 3 Ultra (high), Terminus-2: $0.069; Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh), Terminus-2: $0.10$0$0.05$0.10$0.15$0.20$0.069Nemotron 3 Ultra (high)$0.10Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh)
Data table: Cost per task
Cost per task
ModelDeveloperCost per task
Nemotron 3 Ultra (high), Terminus-2NVIDIA$0.069
Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh), Terminus-2Alibaba (Qwen)$0.10

Output tokens per task

Average output tokens per attempt, reasoning included · Lower is better

Output tokens per taskOutput tokens per task: Nemotron 3 Ultra (high), Terminus-2: 10k; Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh), Terminus-2: 19k05k10k15k20k10kNemotron 3 Ultra (high)19kQwen 3.8 27B (xhigh)
Data table: Output tokens per task
Output tokens per task
ModelDeveloperOutput tokens per task
Nemotron 3 Ultra (high), Terminus-2NVIDIA10k
Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh), Terminus-2Alibaba (Qwen)19k

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Nemotron 3 Ultra (high), Terminus-2 or Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh), Terminus-2?
Nemotron 3 Ultra (high), Terminus-2, 68 to 61.
Which is cheaper per task, Nemotron 3 Ultra (high), Terminus-2 or Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh), Terminus-2?
Nemotron 3 Ultra (high), Terminus-2, $0.069 to $0.10.
Which writes fewer output tokens per task, Nemotron 3 Ultra (high), Terminus-2 or Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh), Terminus-2?
Nemotron 3 Ultra (high), Terminus-2, 10k to 19k.
Which has the larger context window, Nemotron 3 Ultra (high), Terminus-2 or Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh), Terminus-2?
They are level, at 262,144 tokens.

More: Nemotron 3 Ultra (high), Terminus-2 · Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh), Terminus-2 · All comparisons