Kimi Code – Kimi K2.7 Code (always on) vs. Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium): geospatial agent comparison
Comparison between Kimi Code – Kimi K2.7 Code (always on) and Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium) on the Geospatial Agent Index, each benchmark, cost, time and token use, from the same tasks, agent and limits. Methodology.
Side by side
| Metric | Kimi Code – Kimi K2.7 Code (always on) | Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium) |
|---|---|---|
| Geospatial Agent Index | 54* (partial: attempt 1 on 82 of 320 tasks) | 58* |
| Earth-Bench V2 score | 58 | 55 |
| GeoBenchX score | 49 | 61 |
| GeoAgentBench score (guided GIS workflow; outside the index) | No data | 94 |
| GeoAnalystBench score (guided GIS workflow; outside the index) | No data | 95 |
| Raster and remote sensing score | 67 | 56 |
| Vector and overlay score | 0 | 50 |
| Networks and routing score | No data | No data |
| Climate and time series score | 0 | 57 |
| Spatial statistics and interpolation score | 17 | 21 |
| Mapping and cartography score | 81 | 76 |
| Recognising infeasible requests score | 31 | 56 |
| Cost per task | $0.227 | $0.0080 |
| Time per task | 8.3 min | 0.8 min |
| Tokens per attempt | 802k | 252k |
| Turns per attempt | No data | 6.8 |
| Attempts decided | 79 | 320 |
| Input price per 1M tokens | $0.95 | $0.10 |
| Output price per 1M tokens | $4.00 | $0.50 |
| Context window | 262,144 | No data |
| Image input | Yes | No data |
| Developer | Moonshot AI | Anthropic |
Charts
Partial coverage. Kimi Code – Kimi K2.7 Code (always on): 12 of 147 Earth-Bench V2 tasks; 70 of 173 GeoBenchX tasks. Grey placeholders identify these entries in the index, cost and time charts; their height does not represent a value. Comparable bars appear when first-attempt coverage is complete. Their available results remain in the side-by-side table.
Geospatial Agent Index
Equal-weight average of the evaluation scores, 0 to 100 · Higher is better
First eight selected entries in metric order. Full results in table view.
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
| Model | Creator | Geospatial Agent Index | Range while attempts are pending | Benchmarks covered | Coverage (attempts) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium) | Anthropic | 58* | No pending judgements; coverage incomplete | 2 of 2 | 320 of 614 planned attempts |
Cost per task
Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better
First eight selected entries in metric order. Full results in table view.
How to read this chart
Not shown: partial coverage. Kimi Code – Kimi K2.7 Code (always on).
Data table: Cost per task
| Model | Creator | Cost per task | Coverage (attempts) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium) | Anthropic | $0.0080 | 320 of 614 planned attempts |
Time per task
Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better
First eight selected entries in metric order. Full results in table view.
How to read this chart
Not shown: partial coverage. Kimi Code – Kimi K2.7 Code (always on).
Data table: Time per task
| Model | Creator | Time per task | Coverage (attempts) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium) | Anthropic | 0.8 min | 320 of 614 planned attempts |
Frequently asked questions
Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Kimi Code – Kimi K2.7 Code (always on) or Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium)?
Which is cheaper per task, Kimi Code – Kimi K2.7 Code (always on) or Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium)?
Which is faster per task, Kimi Code – Kimi K2.7 Code (always on) or Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium)?
Which has the larger context window, Kimi Code – Kimi K2.7 Code (always on) or Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium)?
More: Kimi Code – Kimi K2.7 Code (always on) · Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium) · all comparisons