Terminus-2 – gpt-oss-120b (high) vs. Codex – gpt-oss-20b (high): geospatial agent comparison

Comparison between Terminus-2 – gpt-oss-120b (high) and Codex – gpt-oss-20b (high) on the Geospatial Agent Index, each benchmark, cost, time and token use, from the same tasks, agent and limits. Methodology.

Side by side

Terminus-2 – gpt-oss-120b (high) vs. Codex – gpt-oss-20b (high)
Metric	Terminus-2 – gpt-oss-120b (high)	Codex – gpt-oss-20b (high)
Geospatial Agent Index	40* (partial: attempt 1 on 561 of 565 tasks)	4* (partial: attempt 1 on 173 of 565 tasks)
Earth-Bench V2 score	43	0
GeoBenchX score	39	8
GS-QA2 score	37	No data
GeoAgentBench score (guided GIS workflow; outside the index)	70	No data
GeoAnalystBench score (guided GIS workflow; outside the index)	53	No data
Raster and remote sensing score	40	0
Vector and overlay score	35	25
Networks and routing score	No data	No data
Climate and time series score	46	0
Spatial statistics and interpolation score	14	0
Mapping and cartography score	39	4
Recognising infeasible requests score	44	12
Cost per task	$0.030	$0.140
Time per task	5.2 min	8.0 min
Tokens per attempt	66k	683k
Turns per attempt	6.1	29.5
Attempts decided	561	170
Input price per 1M tokens	$0.35	$0.20
Output price per 1M tokens	$0.75	$0.30
Context window	128,000	128,000
Image input	No	No
Developer	OpenAI	OpenAI

Charts

Partial coverage. Terminus-2 – gpt-oss-120b (high): 241 of 245 GS-QA2 tasks; Codex – gpt-oss-20b (high): 32 of 147 Earth-Bench V2 tasks; 141 of 173 GeoBenchX tasks; GS-QA2 incomplete. Grey placeholders identify these entries in the index, cost and output token charts; their height does not represent a value. Comparable bars appear when first-attempt coverage is complete. Their available results remain in the side-by-side table.

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal-weight average of the evaluation scores, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

Data table: Geospatial Agent Index

Geospatial Agent Index
Model	Creator	Geospatial Agent Index	Range while attempts are pending	Benchmarks covered	Coverage (attempts)

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

How to read this chart

Not shown: partial coverage. Terminus-2 – gpt-oss-120b (high), Codex – gpt-oss-20b (high).

Data table: Cost per task

Cost per task
Model	Creator	Cost per task	Coverage (attempts)

Output tokens per task

Average output tokens per attempt, reasoning included · Lower is better

How to read this chart

Not shown: partial coverage. Terminus-2 – gpt-oss-120b (high), Codex – gpt-oss-20b (high).

Data table: Output tokens per task

Output tokens per task
Model	Creator	Output tokens per task	Coverage (attempts)

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Terminus-2 – gpt-oss-120b (high) or Codex – gpt-oss-20b (high)?

Not comparable yet: Terminus-2 – gpt-oss-120b (high) has partial coverage (241 of 245 GS-QA2 tasks) and Codex – gpt-oss-20b (high) has partial coverage (32 of 147 Earth-Bench V2 tasks; 141 of 173 GeoBenchX tasks; GS-QA2 incomplete), so it is not ranked. Terminus-2 – gpt-oss-120b (high): 561 of 859 planned attempts. Codex – gpt-oss-20b (high): 170 of 614 planned attempts. Coverage is partial; scores can change as more attempts are decided.

Which is cheaper per task, Terminus-2 – gpt-oss-120b (high) or Codex – gpt-oss-20b (high)?

Terminus-2 – gpt-oss-120b (high), at $0.030 against $0.140 for Codex – gpt-oss-20b (high).

Which writes fewer output tokens per task, Terminus-2 – gpt-oss-120b (high) or Codex – gpt-oss-20b (high)?

Terminus-2 – gpt-oss-120b (high), at 16k against 29k for Codex – gpt-oss-20b (high).

Which has the larger context window, Terminus-2 – gpt-oss-120b (high) or Codex – gpt-oss-20b (high)?

They are level, at 128,000 tokens.

More: Terminus-2 – gpt-oss-120b (high) · Codex – gpt-oss-20b (high) · all comparisons