Axis Spatial

GLM-5.3-Flash (max), Terminus-2 vs. Nemotron 3 Ultra (high), Terminus-2

GLM-5.3-Flash (max), Terminus-2 against Nemotron 3 Ultra (high), Terminus-2: Geospatial Agent Index, each evaluation, cost, time and tokens, on the same tasks and limits. Methodology.

Side by side

GLM-5.3-Flash (max), Terminus-2 vs. Nemotron 3 Ultra (high), Terminus-2
MetricGLM-5.3-Flash (max), Terminus-2Nemotron 3 Ultra (high), Terminus-2
Geospatial Agent Index: Text only6368
Geospatial Agent Index: Text + visionNo dataNo data
Earth-Bench V2 score5168
GeoBenchX score5765
GS-QA2 score8070
Vision agents scoreNo dataNo data
GeoAgentBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)8496
GeoAnalystBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)8463
OGD4All score (standalone; in no index)No dataNo data
GeoNatureAgent score (standalone; in no index)No dataNo data
MultiGlobeQA score (standalone; in no index)No dataNo data
GeoAgentEval score (standalone; in no index)No dataNo data
Remote sensing and raster analysis score6770
GIS analysis score8670
Climate and time series score5168
Spatial statistics score3831
Making maps score6770
Recognising infeasible requests score4868
Cost per task$0.094$0.069
Time per task (at 100 output tokens/s)8.5 min2.4 min
Tokens per attempt817k148k
Turns per attempt15.812.1
Input price per 1M tokens$0.15$0.50
Output price per 1M tokens$0.50$2.20
Context window1,048,576262,144
Image inputYesNo
DeveloperZ.aiNVIDIA

Charts

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal average of Earth-Bench V2, GeoBenchX and GS-QA2, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

Geospatial Agent IndexScores 0 to 100: Nemotron 3 Ultra (high), Terminus-2: 68; GLM-5.3-Flash (max), Terminus-2: 63025507510068Nemotron 3 Ultra (high)63GLM-5.3-Flash (max)
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
Geospatial Agent Index
ModelDeveloperGeospatial Agent Index
Nemotron 3 Ultra (high), Terminus-2NVIDIA68
GLM-5.3-Flash (max), Terminus-2Z.ai63

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

Cost per taskCost per task in US dollars: Nemotron 3 Ultra (high), Terminus-2: $0.069; GLM-5.3-Flash (max), Terminus-2: $0.094$0$0.025$0.05$0.075$0.10$0.069Nemotron 3 Ultra (high)$0.094GLM-5.3-Flash (max)
Data table: Cost per task
Cost per task
ModelDeveloperCost per task
Nemotron 3 Ultra (high), Terminus-2NVIDIA$0.069
GLM-5.3-Flash (max), Terminus-2Z.ai$0.094

Output tokens per task

Average output tokens per attempt, reasoning included · Lower is better

Output tokens per taskOutput tokens per task: Nemotron 3 Ultra (high), Terminus-2: 10k; GLM-5.3-Flash (max), Terminus-2: 30k010k20k30k40k10kNemotron 3 Ultra (high)30kGLM-5.3-Flash (max)
Data table: Output tokens per task
Output tokens per task
ModelDeveloperOutput tokens per task
Nemotron 3 Ultra (high), Terminus-2NVIDIA10k
GLM-5.3-Flash (max), Terminus-2Z.ai30k

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, GLM-5.3-Flash (max), Terminus-2 or Nemotron 3 Ultra (high), Terminus-2?
Nemotron 3 Ultra (high), Terminus-2, 68 to 63.
Which is cheaper per task, GLM-5.3-Flash (max), Terminus-2 or Nemotron 3 Ultra (high), Terminus-2?
Nemotron 3 Ultra (high), Terminus-2, $0.069 to $0.094.
Which writes fewer output tokens per task, GLM-5.3-Flash (max), Terminus-2 or Nemotron 3 Ultra (high), Terminus-2?
Nemotron 3 Ultra (high), Terminus-2, 10k to 30k.
Which has the larger context window, GLM-5.3-Flash (max), Terminus-2 or Nemotron 3 Ultra (high), Terminus-2?
GLM-5.3-Flash (max), Terminus-2, 1,048,576 tokens to 262,144 tokens.

More: GLM-5.3-Flash (max), Terminus-2 · Nemotron 3 Ultra (high), Terminus-2 · All comparisons