Axis Spatial

GLM-5.2 (high), Terminus-2 vs. Nemotron 3 Ultra (high), Terminus-2

GLM-5.2 (high), Terminus-2 against Nemotron 3 Ultra (high), Terminus-2: Geospatial Agent Index, each evaluation, cost, time and tokens, on the same tasks and limits. Methodology.

Side by side

GLM-5.2 (high), Terminus-2 vs. Nemotron 3 Ultra (high), Terminus-2
MetricGLM-5.2 (high), Terminus-2Nemotron 3 Ultra (high), Terminus-2
Geospatial Agent Index: Text only7168
Geospatial Agent Index: Text + visionNo image inputNo data
Earth-Bench V2 score6868
GeoBenchX score6765
GS-QA2 score7870
Vision agents scoreNo image inputNo data
GeoAgentBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)9496
GeoAnalystBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)10063
OGD4All score (standalone; in no index)No dataNo data
GeoNatureAgent score (standalone; in no index)No dataNo data
MultiGlobeQA score (standalone; in no index)No dataNo data
GeoAgentEval score (standalone; in no index)No dataNo data
Remote sensing and raster analysis score7770
GIS analysis score7970
Climate and time series score6868
Spatial statistics score4631
Making maps score8170
Recognising infeasible requests score5368
Cost per task$0.22$0.069
Time per task (at 100 output tokens/s)4.7 min2.4 min
Tokens per attempt325k148k
Turns per attempt12.912.1
Input price per 1M tokens$1.40$0.50
Output price per 1M tokens$4.40$2.20
Context window262,144262,144
Image inputNoNo
DeveloperZ.aiNVIDIA

Charts

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal average of Earth-Bench V2, GeoBenchX and GS-QA2, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

Geospatial Agent IndexScores 0 to 100: GLM-5.2 (high), Terminus-2: 71; Nemotron 3 Ultra (high), Terminus-2: 68025507510071GLM-5.2 (high)68Nemotron 3 Ultra (high)
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
Geospatial Agent Index
ModelDeveloperGeospatial Agent Index
GLM-5.2 (high), Terminus-2Z.ai71
Nemotron 3 Ultra (high), Terminus-2NVIDIA68

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

Cost per taskCost per task in US dollars: Nemotron 3 Ultra (high), Terminus-2: $0.069; GLM-5.2 (high), Terminus-2: $0.22$0$0.10$0.20$0.30$0.40$0.069Nemotron 3 Ultra (high)$0.22GLM-5.2 (high)
Data table: Cost per task
Cost per task
ModelDeveloperCost per task
Nemotron 3 Ultra (high), Terminus-2NVIDIA$0.069
GLM-5.2 (high), Terminus-2Z.ai$0.22

Output tokens per task

Average output tokens per attempt, reasoning included · Lower is better

Output tokens per taskOutput tokens per task: Nemotron 3 Ultra (high), Terminus-2: 10k; GLM-5.2 (high), Terminus-2: 22k010k20k30k40k10kNemotron 3 Ultra (high)22kGLM-5.2 (high)
Data table: Output tokens per task
Output tokens per task
ModelDeveloperOutput tokens per task
Nemotron 3 Ultra (high), Terminus-2NVIDIA10k
GLM-5.2 (high), Terminus-2Z.ai22k

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, GLM-5.2 (high), Terminus-2 or Nemotron 3 Ultra (high), Terminus-2?
GLM-5.2 (high), Terminus-2, 71 to 68.
Which is cheaper per task, GLM-5.2 (high), Terminus-2 or Nemotron 3 Ultra (high), Terminus-2?
Nemotron 3 Ultra (high), Terminus-2, $0.069 to $0.22.
Which writes fewer output tokens per task, GLM-5.2 (high), Terminus-2 or Nemotron 3 Ultra (high), Terminus-2?
Nemotron 3 Ultra (high), Terminus-2, 10k to 22k.
Which has the larger context window, GLM-5.2 (high), Terminus-2 or Nemotron 3 Ultra (high), Terminus-2?
They are level, at 262,144 tokens.

More: GLM-5.2 (high), Terminus-2 · Nemotron 3 Ultra (high), Terminus-2 · All comparisons