Axis Spatial

Search modelsMenu

Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low) vs Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B (Reasoning)

Results updated 9 November 2026 · Both in Terminus-2 · How we benchmark

Verdict

Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low)Not yet rankedno GS-QA2 score yet
Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B (Reasoning)56Geospatial Agent Index · rank 71 of 92

Not comparable yet: Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low) is not yet ranked.

Cost per task
$0.057 vs $0.011
Time per task
0.5 min vs 13.8 min
Tokens per attempt
19k vs 105k
Image input
Yes vs No

Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low), Terminus-2 scores higher on GeoBenchX; Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B (Reasoning), Terminus-2 scores higher on Earth-Bench V2. Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B (Reasoning), Terminus-2 is cheaper ($0.011 against $0.057 per task), but Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low), Terminus-2 is faster (0.5 min against 13.8 min).

Not yet ranked. Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low), Terminus-2: no GS-QA2 score yet. Not in the Agent Index, cost and time charts until it has a score on every index evaluation. Results so far are in the side-by-side table.

Where they differ most

By kind of work, share of tasks passed, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

Kind of workGemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low)Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B (Reasoning)
Change detection2556
Making maps6070
GIS analysis8070
Remote sensing and raster analysis5954
World map of the places the tasks are setWhere the tasks are set: each kind of work links to its tasks and scores
Leaderboard

Charts for each: Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low), Terminus-2 · Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B (Reasoning), Terminus-2.

Side by side

Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low), Terminus-2 vs. Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B (Reasoning), Terminus-2
MetricGemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low), Terminus-2Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B (Reasoning), Terminus-2
Geospatial Agent Index: Text only5756
Geospatial Agent Index: Text + visionNo dataNo data
Earth-Bench V2 score4149
GeoBenchX score7456
GS-QA2 scoreNo data63
Vision agents scoreNo dataNo data
GeoAgentBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)8483
GeoAnalystBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)7979
OGD4All score (standalone; in no index)No data85
GeoNatureAgent score (standalone; in no index)No data100
MultiGlobeQA score (standalone; in no index)No data70
GeoAgentEval score (standalone; in no index)No data84
ImpactMesh score (standalone; in no index)No dataNo data
Remote sensing and raster analysis score5954
Change detection score2556
GIS analysis score8070
Climate and time series score4550
Making maps score6070
Cost per task$0.057$0.011
Time per task (at 100 output tokens/s)0.5 min13.8 min
Tokens per attempt19k105k
Turns per attempt3.610.5
Input price per 1M tokens$2.00$0.20
Output price per 1M tokens$12.00$0.50
Context window1,048,576262,144
Image inputYesNo
DeveloperGoogleNVIDIA

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low), Terminus-2 or Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B (Reasoning), Terminus-2?
Not comparable yet: Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low), Terminus-2 is not yet ranked (no GS-QA2 score yet).
Which is cheaper per task, Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low), Terminus-2 or Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B (Reasoning), Terminus-2?
Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B (Reasoning), Terminus-2, $0.011 to $0.057.
Which writes fewer output tokens per task, Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low), Terminus-2 or Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B (Reasoning), Terminus-2?
Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low), Terminus-2, 2k to 8k.
Which has the larger context window, Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low), Terminus-2 or Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B (Reasoning), Terminus-2?
Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low), Terminus-2, 1,048,576 tokens to 262,144 tokens.