Axis Spatial

Step 5 Preview (Reasoning), Terminus-2 vs. GLM-5.3 (max), Claude Code

Step 5 Preview (Reasoning), Terminus-2 against GLM-5.3 (max), Claude Code: Geospatial Agent Index, each evaluation, cost, time and tokens, on the same tasks and limits. The harnesses differ, so part of any gap can come from the harness. Methodology.

Side by side

Step 5 Preview (Reasoning), Terminus-2 vs. GLM-5.3 (max), Claude Code
MetricStep 5 Preview (Reasoning), Terminus-2GLM-5.3 (max), Claude Code
Geospatial Agent Index: Text only3473
Geospatial Agent Index: Text + visionNo dataNo image input
Earth-Bench V2 score3274
GeoBenchX score1765
GS-QA2 score5281
Vision agents scoreNo dataNo image input
GeoAgentBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)5098
GeoAnalystBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)5395
OGD4All score (standalone; in no index)No dataNo data
GeoNatureAgent score (standalone; in no index)No dataNo data
MultiGlobeQA score (standalone; in no index)No dataNo data
GeoAgentEval score (standalone; in no index)No dataNo data
Remote sensing and raster analysis score3580
GIS analysis score6781
Climate and time series score3476
Spatial statistics score038
Making maps score1975
Recognising infeasible requests score2458
Cost per task$0.071$0.48
Time per task (at 100 output tokens/s)7.9 min (estimated)4.3 min
Tokens per attempt90k489k
Turns per attempt11.113.4
Input price per 1M tokens$1.00$1.40
Output price per 1M tokens$2.70$4.40
Context window1,024,0001,048,576
Image inputYesNo
DeveloperStepFunZ.ai

Charts

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal average of Earth-Bench V2, GeoBenchX and GS-QA2, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

Geospatial Agent IndexScores 0 to 100: GLM-5.3 (max), Claude Code: 73; Step 5 Preview (Reasoning), Terminus-2: 34025507510073GLM-5.3 (max)34Step 5 Preview (Reasoning)
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
Geospatial Agent Index
ModelDeveloperGeospatial Agent Index
GLM-5.3 (max), Claude CodeZ.ai73
Step 5 Preview (Reasoning), Terminus-2StepFun34

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

Cost per taskCost per task in US dollars: Step 5 Preview (Reasoning), Terminus-2: $0.071; GLM-5.3 (max), Claude Code: $0.48$0$0.15$0.30$0.45$0.60$0.071Step 5 Preview (Reasoning)$0.48GLM-5.3 (max)
Data table: Cost per task
Cost per task
ModelDeveloperCost per task
Step 5 Preview (Reasoning), Terminus-2StepFun$0.071
GLM-5.3 (max), Claude CodeZ.ai$0.48

Output tokens per task

Average output tokens per attempt, reasoning included · Lower is better

Output tokens per taskOutput tokens per task: Step 5 Preview (Reasoning), Terminus-2: 10k; GLM-5.3 (max), Claude Code: 15k05k10k15k20k10kStep 5 Preview (Reasoning)15kGLM-5.3 (max)
Data table: Output tokens per task
Output tokens per task
ModelDeveloperOutput tokens per task
Step 5 Preview (Reasoning), Terminus-2StepFun10k
GLM-5.3 (max), Claude CodeZ.ai15k

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Step 5 Preview (Reasoning), Terminus-2 or GLM-5.3 (max), Claude Code?
GLM-5.3 (max), Claude Code, 73 to 34.
Which is cheaper per task, Step 5 Preview (Reasoning), Terminus-2 or GLM-5.3 (max), Claude Code?
Step 5 Preview (Reasoning), Terminus-2, $0.071 to $0.48.
Which writes fewer output tokens per task, Step 5 Preview (Reasoning), Terminus-2 or GLM-5.3 (max), Claude Code?
Step 5 Preview (Reasoning), Terminus-2, 10k to 15k.
Which has the larger context window, Step 5 Preview (Reasoning), Terminus-2 or GLM-5.3 (max), Claude Code?
GLM-5.3 (max), Claude Code, 1,048,576 tokens to 1,024,000 tokens.

More: Step 5 Preview (Reasoning), Terminus-2 · GLM-5.3 (max), Claude Code · All comparisons