Axis Spatial

Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh), Terminus-2 vs. Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code

Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh), Terminus-2 against Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code: Geospatial Agent Index, each evaluation, cost, time and tokens, on the same tasks and limits. The harnesses differ, so part of any gap can come from the harness. Methodology.

Side by side

Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh), Terminus-2 vs. Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code
MetricQwen 3.8 27B (xhigh), Terminus-2Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code
Geospatial Agent Index: Text only6169
Geospatial Agent Index: Text + visionNo data71
Earth-Bench V2 score4456
GeoBenchX score6677
GS-QA2 score7476
Vision agents scoreNo data78
GeoAgentBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)6094
GeoAnalystBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)8995
OGD4All score (standalone; in no index)No data96
GeoNatureAgent score (standalone; in no index)No data100
MultiGlobeQA score (standalone; in no index)No data77
GeoAgentEval score (standalone; in no index)No data100
Remote sensing and raster analysis score6469
GIS analysis score7775
Climate and time series score4259
Spatial statistics score6938
Making maps score6884
Recognising infeasible requests score5780
Cost per task$0.10$0.043
Time per task (at 100 output tokens/s)7.3 min0.4 min
Tokens per attempt335k70k
Turns per attempt14.83.9
Input price per 1M tokens$0.45$2.00
Output price per 1M tokens$3.20$10.00
Context window262,1441,000,000
Image inputYesYes
DeveloperAlibaba (Qwen)Anthropic

Charts

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal average of Earth-Bench V2, GeoBenchX and GS-QA2, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

Geospatial Agent IndexScores 0 to 100: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code: 69; Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh), Terminus-2: 61025507510069Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low)61Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh)
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
Geospatial Agent Index
ModelDeveloperGeospatial Agent Index
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude CodeAnthropic69
Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh), Terminus-2Alibaba (Qwen)61

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

Cost per taskCost per task in US dollars: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code: $0.043; Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh), Terminus-2: $0.10$0$0.05$0.10$0.15$0.20$0.043Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low)$0.10Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh)
Data table: Cost per task
Cost per task
ModelDeveloperCost per task
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude CodeAnthropic$0.043
Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh), Terminus-2Alibaba (Qwen)$0.10

Output tokens per task

Average output tokens per attempt, reasoning included · Lower is better

Output tokens per taskOutput tokens per task: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code: 1k; Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh), Terminus-2: 19k05k10k15k20k1kClaude Sonnet 5.5 (low)19kQwen 3.8 27B (xhigh)
Data table: Output tokens per task
Output tokens per task
ModelDeveloperOutput tokens per task
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude CodeAnthropic1k
Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh), Terminus-2Alibaba (Qwen)19k

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh), Terminus-2 or Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code?
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code, 69 to 61.
Which is cheaper per task, Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh), Terminus-2 or Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code?
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code, $0.043 to $0.10.
Which writes fewer output tokens per task, Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh), Terminus-2 or Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code?
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code, 1k to 19k.
Which has the larger context window, Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh), Terminus-2 or Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code?
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code, 1,000,000 tokens to 262,144 tokens.

More: Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh), Terminus-2 · Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code · All comparisons