Axis Spatial

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2 vs. Step 5 Preview (Reasoning), Terminus-2

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2 against Step 5 Preview (Reasoning), Terminus-2: Geospatial Agent Index, each evaluation, cost, time and tokens, on the same tasks and limits. Methodology.

Side by side

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2 vs. Step 5 Preview (Reasoning), Terminus-2
MetricNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2Step 5 Preview (Reasoning), Terminus-2
Geospatial Agent Index: Text only2034
Geospatial Agent Index: Text + visionNo dataNo data
Earth-Bench V2 score2932
GeoBenchX score2117
GS-QA2 score952
Vision agents scoreNo dataNo data
GeoAgentBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)2650
GeoAnalystBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)1653
OGD4All score (standalone; in no index)No dataNo data
GeoNatureAgent score (standalone; in no index)No dataNo data
MultiGlobeQA score (standalone; in no index)No dataNo data
GeoAgentEval score (standalone; in no index)No dataNo data
Remote sensing and raster analysis score1735
GIS analysis score667
Climate and time series score2734
Spatial statistics score00
Making maps score1619
Recognising infeasible requests score3324
Cost per task$0.13$0.071
Time per task (at 100 output tokens/s)4.9 min7.9 min (estimated)
Tokens per attempt589k90k
Turns per attempt30.711.1
Input price per 1M tokens$0.20$1.00
Output price per 1M tokens$0.80$2.70
Context window256,0001,024,000
Image inputYesYes
DeveloperNVIDIAStepFun

Charts

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal average of Earth-Bench V2, GeoBenchX and GS-QA2, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

Geospatial Agent IndexScores 0 to 100: Step 5 Preview (Reasoning), Terminus-2: 34; Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2: 20025507510034Step 5 Preview (Reasoning)20Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning)
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
Geospatial Agent Index
ModelDeveloperGeospatial Agent Index
Step 5 Preview (Reasoning), Terminus-2StepFun34
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2NVIDIA20

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

Cost per taskCost per task in US dollars: Step 5 Preview (Reasoning), Terminus-2: $0.071; Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2: $0.13$0$0.05$0.10$0.15$0.20$0.071Step 5 Preview (Reasoning)$0.13Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning)
Data table: Cost per task
Cost per task
ModelDeveloperCost per task
Step 5 Preview (Reasoning), Terminus-2StepFun$0.071
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2NVIDIA$0.13

Output tokens per task

Average output tokens per attempt, reasoning included · Lower is better

Output tokens per taskOutput tokens per task: Step 5 Preview (Reasoning), Terminus-2: 10k; Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2: 22k010k20k30k40k10kStep 5 Preview (Reasoning)22kNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning)
Data table: Output tokens per task
Output tokens per task
ModelDeveloperOutput tokens per task
Step 5 Preview (Reasoning), Terminus-2StepFun10k
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2NVIDIA22k

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2 or Step 5 Preview (Reasoning), Terminus-2?
Step 5 Preview (Reasoning), Terminus-2, 34 to 20.
Which is cheaper per task, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2 or Step 5 Preview (Reasoning), Terminus-2?
Step 5 Preview (Reasoning), Terminus-2, $0.071 to $0.13.
Which writes fewer output tokens per task, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2 or Step 5 Preview (Reasoning), Terminus-2?
Step 5 Preview (Reasoning), Terminus-2, 10k to 22k.
Which has the larger context window, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2 or Step 5 Preview (Reasoning), Terminus-2?
Step 5 Preview (Reasoning), Terminus-2, 1,024,000 tokens to 256,000 tokens.

More: Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2 · Step 5 Preview (Reasoning), Terminus-2 · All comparisons