Axis Spatial

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2 vs. GPT-6 Luna (high), Codex

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2 against GPT-6 Luna (high), Codex: Geospatial Agent Index, each evaluation, cost, time and tokens, on the same tasks and limits. The harnesses differ, so part of any gap can come from the harness. Methodology.

Side by side

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2 vs. GPT-6 Luna (high), Codex
MetricNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2GPT-6 Luna (high), Codex
Geospatial Agent Index: Text only2071
Geospatial Agent Index: Text + visionNo data70
Earth-Bench V2 score2963
GeoBenchX score2174
GS-QA2 score977
Vision agents scoreNo data67
GeoAgentBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)2696
GeoAnalystBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)16100
OGD4All score (standalone; in no index)No dataNo data
GeoNatureAgent score (standalone; in no index)No dataNo data
MultiGlobeQA score (standalone; in no index)No dataNo data
GeoAgentEval score (standalone; in no index)No dataNo data
Remote sensing and raster analysis score1773
GIS analysis score677
Climate and time series score2766
Spatial statistics score054
Making maps score1679
Recognising infeasible requests score3375
Cost per task$0.13$0.0040
Time per task (at 100 output tokens/s)4.9 min0.7 min
Tokens per attempt589k120k
Turns per attempt30.77.4
Input price per 1M tokens$0.20$0.10
Output price per 1M tokens$0.80$0.50
Context window256,0001,050,000
Image inputYesYes
DeveloperNVIDIAOpenAI

Charts

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal average of Earth-Bench V2, GeoBenchX and GS-QA2, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

Geospatial Agent IndexScores 0 to 100: GPT-6 Luna (high), Codex: 71; Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2: 20025507510071GPT-6 Luna (high)20Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning)
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
Geospatial Agent Index
ModelDeveloperGeospatial Agent Index
GPT-6 Luna (high), CodexOpenAI71
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2NVIDIA20

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

Cost per taskCost per task in US dollars: GPT-6 Luna (high), Codex: $0.0040; Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2: $0.13$0$0.05$0.10$0.15$0.20$0.0040GPT-6 Luna (high)$0.13Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning)
Data table: Cost per task
Cost per task
ModelDeveloperCost per task
GPT-6 Luna (high), CodexOpenAI$0.0040
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2NVIDIA$0.13

Output tokens per task

Average output tokens per attempt, reasoning included · Lower is better

Output tokens per taskOutput tokens per task: GPT-6 Luna (high), Codex: 3k; Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2: 22k010k20k30k40k3kGPT-6 Luna (high)22kNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning)
Data table: Output tokens per task
Output tokens per task
ModelDeveloperOutput tokens per task
GPT-6 Luna (high), CodexOpenAI3k
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2NVIDIA22k

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2 or GPT-6 Luna (high), Codex?
GPT-6 Luna (high), Codex, 71 to 20.
Which is cheaper per task, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2 or GPT-6 Luna (high), Codex?
GPT-6 Luna (high), Codex, $0.0040 to $0.13.
Which writes fewer output tokens per task, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2 or GPT-6 Luna (high), Codex?
GPT-6 Luna (high), Codex, 3k to 22k.
Which has the larger context window, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2 or GPT-6 Luna (high), Codex?
GPT-6 Luna (high), Codex, 1,050,000 tokens to 256,000 tokens.

More: Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2 · GPT-6 Luna (high), Codex · All comparisons