Mistral Large 4 (high) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (max)
Results updated 3 November 2026 · In Terminus-2 and Codex, so part of any gap can come from the harness · How we benchmark
Verdict
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (max) clearly beats Mistral Large 4 (high) by 12 points, and is cheaper and faster.
- Cost per task
- $0.10 vs $0.067
- Time per task
- 12.0 min vs 8.6 min
- Tokens per attempt
- 226k vs 1.17M
- Image input
- Yes vs Yes
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (max), Codex scores higher than Mistral Large 4 (high), Terminus-2 on all 3 evaluations scored for both. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (max), Codex is cheaper and faster: $0.067 against $0.10 per task, and 8.6 min against 12.0 min.
Where they differ most
By kind of work, share of tasks passed, 0 to 100 · Higher is better
| Kind of work | Mistral Large 4 (high) | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (max) |
|---|---|---|
| Climate and time series | 40 | 58 |
| Recognising infeasible requests | 23 | 41 |
| Remote sensing and raster analysis | 67 | 83 |
| Making maps | 82 | 72 |
Charts for each: Mistral Large 4 (high), Terminus-2 · DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (max), Codex.
Side by side
| Metric | Mistral Large 4 (high), Terminus-2 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (max), Codex |
|---|---|---|
| Geospatial Agent Index: Text only | 59 | 71 |
| Geospatial Agent Index: Text + vision | No data | 73 |
| Earth-Bench V2 score | 46 | 66 |
| GeoBenchX score | 55 | 56 |
| GS-QA2 score | 77 | 89 |
| Vision agents score | No data | 80 |
| GeoAgentBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index) | 80 | 90 |
| GeoAnalystBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index) | 94 | 88 |
| OGD4All score (standalone; in no index) | 96 | No data |
| GeoNatureAgent score (standalone; in no index) | 100 | No data |
| MultiGlobeQA score (standalone; in no index) | 62 | No data |
| GeoAgentEval score (standalone; in no index) | 60 | No data |
| Remote sensing and raster analysis score | 67 | 83 |
| GIS analysis score | 82 | 90 |
| Climate and time series score | 40 | 58 |
| Spatial statistics score | 46 | 46 |
| Making maps score | 82 | 72 |
| Recognising infeasible requests score | 23 | 41 |
| Cost per task | $0.10 | $0.067 |
| Time per task (at 100 output tokens/s) | 12.0 min | 8.6 min |
| Tokens per attempt | 226k | 1.17M |
| Turns per attempt | 13.8 | 23.4 |
| Input price per 1M tokens | $0.70 | $0.30 |
| Output price per 1M tokens | $2.10 | $1.20 |
| Context window | 262,144 | 1,048,576 |
| Image input | Yes | Yes |
| Developer | Mistral AI | DeepSeek |
Frequently asked questions
Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Mistral Large 4 (high), Terminus-2 or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (max), Codex?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (max), Codex, 71 to 59.
Which is cheaper per task, Mistral Large 4 (high), Terminus-2 or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (max), Codex?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (max), Codex, $0.067 to $0.10.
Which writes fewer output tokens per task, Mistral Large 4 (high), Terminus-2 or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (max), Codex?
Mistral Large 4 (high), Terminus-2, 14k to 38k.
Which has the larger context window, Mistral Large 4 (high), Terminus-2 or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (max), Codex?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (max), Codex, 1,048,576 tokens to 262,144 tokens.
