Axis Spatial

MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2 vs. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2

MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2 against Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2: Geospatial Agent Index, each evaluation, cost, time and tokens, on the same tasks and limits. Methodology.

Side by side

MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2 vs. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2
MetricMiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2
Geospatial Agent Index: Text only5111
Geospatial Agent Index: Text + visionNo dataNo data
Earth-Bench V2 score3916
GeoBenchX score4112
GS-QA2 score714
Vision agents scoreNo dataNo data
GeoAgentBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)8810
GeoAnalystBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)4732
OGD4All score (standalone; in no index)No dataNo data
GeoNatureAgent score (standalone; in no index)No dataNo data
MultiGlobeQA score (standalone; in no index)No dataNo data
GeoAgentEval score (standalone; in no index)No dataNo data
Remote sensing and raster analysis score5711
GIS analysis score777
Climate and time series score3415
Spatial statistics score220
Making maps score537
Recognising infeasible requests score3312
Cost per task$0.017$0.012
Time per task (at 100 output tokens/s)8.6 min4.9 min
Tokens per attempt263k249k
Turns per attempt13.317.3
Input price per 1M tokens$0.15$0.070
Output price per 1M tokens$0.60$0.20
Context window1,000,000262,144
Image inputYesNo
DeveloperMiniMaxNVIDIA

Charts

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal average of Earth-Bench V2, GeoBenchX and GS-QA2, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

Geospatial Agent IndexScores 0 to 100: MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2: 51; Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2: 11025507510051MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max)11Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning)
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
Geospatial Agent Index
ModelDeveloperGeospatial Agent Index
MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2MiniMax51
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2NVIDIA11

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

Cost per taskCost per task in US dollars: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2: $0.012; MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2: $0.017$0$0.005$0.01$0.015$0.02$0.012Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning)$0.017MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max)
Data table: Cost per task
Cost per task
ModelDeveloperCost per task
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2NVIDIA$0.012
MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2MiniMax$0.017

Output tokens per task

Average output tokens per attempt, reasoning included · Lower is better

Output tokens per taskOutput tokens per task: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2: 6k; MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2: 19k05k10k15k20k6kNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning)19kMiniMax M3.1 Flash (max)
Data table: Output tokens per task
Output tokens per task
ModelDeveloperOutput tokens per task
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2NVIDIA6k
MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2MiniMax19k

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2 or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2?
MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2, 51 to 11.
Which is cheaper per task, MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2 or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2?
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2, $0.012 to $0.017.
Which writes fewer output tokens per task, MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2 or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2?
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2, 6k to 19k.
Which has the larger context window, MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2 or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2?
MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2, 1,000,000 tokens to 262,144 tokens.

More: MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2 · Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2 · All comparisons