Axis Spatial

MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash (max), Claude Code

MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2 against GLM-5.3-Flash (max), Claude Code: Geospatial Agent Index, each evaluation, cost, time and tokens, on the same tasks and limits. The harnesses differ, so part of any gap can come from the harness. Methodology.

Side by side

MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash (max), Claude Code
MetricMiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2GLM-5.3-Flash (max), Claude Code
Geospatial Agent Index: Text only5172
Geospatial Agent Index: Text + visionNo data73
Earth-Bench V2 score3969
GeoBenchX score4270
GS-QA2 score7176
Vision agents scoreNo data78
GeoAgentBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)8898
GeoAnalystBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)47100
OGD4All score (standalone; in no index)No dataNo data
GeoNatureAgent score (standalone; in no index)No dataNo data
MultiGlobeQA score (standalone; in no index)No dataNo data
GeoAgentEval score (standalone; in no index)No dataNo data
Remote sensing and raster analysis score5774
GIS analysis score7779
Climate and time series score3467
Spatial statistics score2578
Making maps score5774
Recognising infeasible requests score3065
Cost per task$0.017$0.093
Time per task (at 100 output tokens/s)8.4 min6.5 min (estimated)
Tokens per attempt254k962k
Turns per attempt13.218.9
Input price per 1M tokens$0.15$0.15
Output price per 1M tokens$0.60$0.50
Context window1,000,0001,048,576
Image inputYesYes
DeveloperOtherZ.ai

Charts

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal average of Earth-Bench V2, GeoBenchX and GS-QA2, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

Geospatial Agent IndexScores 0 to 100: GLM-5.3-Flash (max), Claude Code: 72; MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2: 51025507510072GLM-5.3-Flash (max)51MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max)
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
Geospatial Agent Index
ModelDeveloperGeospatial Agent Index
GLM-5.3-Flash (max), Claude CodeZ.ai72
MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2Other51

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

Cost per taskCost per task in US dollars: MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2: $0.017; GLM-5.3-Flash (max), Claude Code: $0.093$0$0.025$0.05$0.075$0.10$0.017MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max)$0.093GLM-5.3-Flash (max)
Data table: Cost per task
Cost per task
ModelDeveloperCost per task
MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2Other$0.017
GLM-5.3-Flash (max), Claude CodeZ.ai$0.093

Output tokens per task

Average output tokens per attempt, reasoning included · Lower is better

Output tokens per taskOutput tokens per task: MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2: 18k; GLM-5.3-Flash (max), Claude Code: 29k010k20k30k40k18kMiniMax M3.1 Flash (max)29kGLM-5.3-Flash (max)
Data table: Output tokens per task
Output tokens per task
ModelDeveloperOutput tokens per task
MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2Other18k
GLM-5.3-Flash (max), Claude CodeZ.ai29k

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2 or GLM-5.3-Flash (max), Claude Code?
GLM-5.3-Flash (max), Claude Code, 72 to 51.
Which is cheaper per task, MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2 or GLM-5.3-Flash (max), Claude Code?
MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2, $0.017 to $0.093.
Which writes fewer output tokens per task, MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2 or GLM-5.3-Flash (max), Claude Code?
MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2, 18k to 29k.
Which has the larger context window, MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2 or GLM-5.3-Flash (max), Claude Code?
GLM-5.3-Flash (max), Claude Code, 1,048,576 tokens to 1,000,000 tokens.

More: MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2 · GLM-5.3-Flash (max), Claude Code · All comparisons