Axis Spatial

MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2 vs. GLM-5.2 (max), Claude Code

MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2 against GLM-5.2 (max), Claude Code: Geospatial Agent Index, each evaluation, cost, time and tokens, on the same tasks and limits. The harnesses differ, so part of any gap can come from the harness. Methodology.

Side by side

MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2 vs. GLM-5.2 (max), Claude Code
MetricMiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2GLM-5.2 (max), Claude Code
Geospatial Agent Index: Text only5173
Geospatial Agent Index: Text + visionNo dataNo image input
Earth-Bench V2 score3971
GeoBenchX score4266
GS-QA2 score7183
Vision agents scoreNo dataNo image input
GeoAgentBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)88No data
GeoAnalystBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)47No data
OGD4All score (standalone; in no index)No dataNo data
GeoNatureAgent score (standalone; in no index)No dataNo data
MultiGlobeQA score (standalone; in no index)No dataNo data
GeoAgentEval score (standalone; in no index)No dataNo data
Remote sensing and raster analysis score5780
GIS analysis score7781
Climate and time series score3472
Spatial statistics score2546
Making maps score5784
Recognising infeasible requests score3052
Cost per task$0.017$0.34
Time per task (at 100 output tokens/s)8.4 min6.3 min
Tokens per attempt254k617k
Turns per attempt13.215.4
Input price per 1M tokens$0.15$1.40
Output price per 1M tokens$0.60$4.40
Context window1,000,000262,144
Image inputYesNo
DeveloperOtherZ.ai

Charts

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal average of Earth-Bench V2, GeoBenchX and GS-QA2, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

Geospatial Agent IndexScores 0 to 100: GLM-5.2 (max), Claude Code: 73; MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2: 51025507510073GLM-5.2 (max)51MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max)
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
Geospatial Agent Index
ModelDeveloperGeospatial Agent Index
GLM-5.2 (max), Claude CodeZ.ai73
MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2Other51

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

Cost per taskCost per task in US dollars: MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2: $0.017; GLM-5.2 (max), Claude Code: $0.34$0$0.10$0.20$0.30$0.40$0.017MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max)$0.34GLM-5.2 (max)
Data table: Cost per task
Cost per task
ModelDeveloperCost per task
MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2Other$0.017
GLM-5.2 (max), Claude CodeZ.ai$0.34

Output tokens per task

Average output tokens per attempt, reasoning included · Lower is better

Output tokens per taskOutput tokens per task: MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2: 18k; GLM-5.2 (max), Claude Code: 28k010k20k30k40k18kMiniMax M3.1 Flash (max)28kGLM-5.2 (max)
Data table: Output tokens per task
Output tokens per task
ModelDeveloperOutput tokens per task
MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2Other18k
GLM-5.2 (max), Claude CodeZ.ai28k

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2 or GLM-5.2 (max), Claude Code?
GLM-5.2 (max), Claude Code, 73 to 51.
Which is cheaper per task, MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2 or GLM-5.2 (max), Claude Code?
MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2, $0.017 to $0.34.
Which writes fewer output tokens per task, MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2 or GLM-5.2 (max), Claude Code?
MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2, 18k to 28k.
Which has the larger context window, MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2 or GLM-5.2 (max), Claude Code?
MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2, 1,000,000 tokens to 262,144 tokens.

More: MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2 · GLM-5.2 (max), Claude Code · All comparisons