Axis Spatial

MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2 vs. Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium), Claude Code

MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2 against Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium), Claude Code: Geospatial Agent Index, each evaluation, cost, time and tokens, on the same tasks and limits. The harnesses differ, so part of any gap can come from the harness. Methodology.

Side by side

MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2 vs. Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium), Claude Code
MetricMiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium), Claude Code
Geospatial Agent Index: Text only5171
Geospatial Agent Index: Text + visionNo dataNo data
Earth-Bench V2 score3958
GeoBenchX score4276
GS-QA2 score7179
Vision agents scoreNo dataNo data
GeoAgentBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)8898
GeoAnalystBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)4795
OGD4All score (standalone; in no index)No data96
GeoNatureAgent score (standalone; in no index)No data100
MultiGlobeQA score (standalone; in no index)No data76
GeoAgentEval score (standalone; in no index)No data96
Remote sensing and raster analysis score5771
GIS analysis score7781
Climate and time series score3461
Spatial statistics score2562
Making maps score5779
Recognising infeasible requests score3075
Cost per task$0.017$0.046
Time per task (at 100 output tokens/s)8.4 min0.4 min
Tokens per attempt254k76k
Turns per attempt13.24.2
Input price per 1M tokens$0.15$2.00
Output price per 1M tokens$0.60$10.00
Context window1,000,0001,000,000
Image inputYesYes
DeveloperOtherAnthropic

Charts

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal average of Earth-Bench V2, GeoBenchX and GS-QA2, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

Geospatial Agent IndexScores 0 to 100: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium), Claude Code: 71; MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2: 51025507510071Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium)51MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max)
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
Geospatial Agent Index
ModelDeveloperGeospatial Agent Index
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium), Claude CodeAnthropic71
MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2Other51

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

Cost per taskCost per task in US dollars: MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2: $0.017; Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium), Claude Code: $0.046$0$0.015$0.03$0.045$0.06$0.017MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max)$0.046Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium)
Data table: Cost per task
Cost per task
ModelDeveloperCost per task
MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2Other$0.017
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium), Claude CodeAnthropic$0.046

Output tokens per task

Average output tokens per attempt, reasoning included · Lower is better

Output tokens per taskOutput tokens per task: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium), Claude Code: 1k; MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2: 18k05k10k15k20k1kClaude Sonnet 5.5 (medium)18kMiniMax M3.1 Flash (max)
Data table: Output tokens per task
Output tokens per task
ModelDeveloperOutput tokens per task
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium), Claude CodeAnthropic1k
MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2Other18k

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2 or Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium), Claude Code?
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium), Claude Code, 71 to 51.
Which is cheaper per task, MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2 or Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium), Claude Code?
MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2, $0.017 to $0.046.
Which writes fewer output tokens per task, MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2 or Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium), Claude Code?
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium), Claude Code, 1k to 18k.
Which has the larger context window, MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2 or Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium), Claude Code?
They are level, at 1,000,000 tokens.

More: MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2 · Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium), Claude Code · All comparisons