Axis Spatial

MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2 vs. Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium), Claude Code

MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2 against Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium), Claude Code: Geospatial Agent Index, each evaluation, cost, time and tokens, on the same tasks and limits. The harnesses differ, so part of any gap can come from the harness. Methodology.

Side by side

MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2 vs. Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium), Claude Code
MetricMiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium), Claude Code
Geospatial Agent Index: Text only5172
Geospatial Agent Index: Text + visionNo dataNo data
Earth-Bench V2 score3968
GeoBenchX score4271
GS-QA2 score7179
Vision agents scoreNo dataNo data
GeoAgentBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)8894
GeoAnalystBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)4795
OGD4All score (standalone; in no index)No data95
GeoNatureAgent score (standalone; in no index)No data100
MultiGlobeQA score (standalone; in no index)No data73
GeoAgentEval score (standalone; in no index)No data92
Remote sensing and raster analysis score5776
GIS analysis score7780
Climate and time series score3466
Spatial statistics score2523
Making maps score5779
Recognising infeasible requests score3073
Cost per task$0.017$0.0063
Time per task (at 100 output tokens/s)8.4 min1.0 min
Tokens per attempt254k210k
Turns per attempt13.26.1
Input price per 1M tokens$0.15$0.10
Output price per 1M tokens$0.60$0.50
Context window1,000,0001,000,000
Image inputYesYes
DeveloperOtherAnthropic

Charts

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal average of Earth-Bench V2, GeoBenchX and GS-QA2, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

Geospatial Agent IndexScores 0 to 100: Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium), Claude Code: 72; MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2: 51025507510072Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium)51MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max)
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
Geospatial Agent Index
ModelDeveloperGeospatial Agent Index
Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium), Claude CodeAnthropic72
MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2Other51

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

Cost per taskCost per task in US dollars: Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium), Claude Code: $0.0063; MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2: $0.017$0$0.005$0.01$0.015$0.02$0.0063Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium)$0.017MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max)
Data table: Cost per task
Cost per task
ModelDeveloperCost per task
Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium), Claude CodeAnthropic$0.0063
MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2Other$0.017

Output tokens per task

Average output tokens per attempt, reasoning included · Lower is better

Output tokens per taskOutput tokens per task: Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium), Claude Code: 4k; MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2: 18k05k10k15k20k4kClaude Haiku 5.5 (medium)18kMiniMax M3.1 Flash (max)
Data table: Output tokens per task
Output tokens per task
ModelDeveloperOutput tokens per task
Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium), Claude CodeAnthropic4k
MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2Other18k

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2 or Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium), Claude Code?
Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium), Claude Code, 72 to 51.
Which is cheaper per task, MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2 or Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium), Claude Code?
Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium), Claude Code, $0.0063 to $0.017.
Which writes fewer output tokens per task, MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2 or Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium), Claude Code?
Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium), Claude Code, 4k to 18k.
Which has the larger context window, MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2 or Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium), Claude Code?
They are level, at 1,000,000 tokens.

More: MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2 · Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium), Claude Code · All comparisons