Axis Spatial

Kimi K3 (Reasoning), Terminus-2 vs. Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh), Qwen Code

Kimi K3 (Reasoning), Terminus-2 against Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh), Qwen Code: Geospatial Agent Index, each evaluation, cost, time and tokens, on the same tasks and limits. The harnesses differ, so part of any gap can come from the harness. Methodology.

Side by side

Kimi K3 (Reasoning), Terminus-2 vs. Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh), Qwen Code
MetricKimi K3 (Reasoning), Terminus-2Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh), Qwen Code
Geospatial Agent Index: Text only7268
Geospatial Agent Index: Text + visionNot run: Vision agentsNot run: Vision agents
Earth-Bench V2 score7268
GeoBenchX score6462
GS-QA2 score8075
Vision agents scoreNo dataNo data
GeoAgentBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)9494
GeoAnalystBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)8979
Raster and remote sensing score8076
Vector and overlay score7675
Climate and time series score7161
Spatial statistics and interpolation score5454
Mapping and cartography score8163
Recognising infeasible requests score5060
Cost per task$0.23$0.22
Time per task (at 100 output tokens/s)2.7 min4.7 min (estimated)
Tokens per attempt53k840k
Turns per attempt7.217.6
Attempts scored488488
Input price per 1M tokens$3.00$0.45
Output price per 1M tokens$15.00$3.20
Context window1,000,000262,144
Image inputYesYes
DeveloperMoonshot AIAlibaba (Qwen)

Charts

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal average of Earth-Bench V2, GeoBenchX and GS-QA2, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

Geospatial Agent IndexScores 0 to 100: Kimi K3 (Reasoning), Terminus-2: 72; Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh), Qwen Code: 68025507510072Kimi K3 (Reasoning)68Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh)
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
Geospatial Agent Index
ModelDeveloperGeospatial Agent IndexStatusEvaluations scoredTasks attempted
Kimi K3 (Reasoning), Terminus-2Moonshot AI72Complete3 of 3488 of 488 tasks
Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh), Qwen CodeAlibaba (Qwen)68Complete3 of 3488 of 488 tasks

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

Cost per taskCost per task in US dollars: Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh), Qwen Code: $0.22; Kimi K3 (Reasoning), Terminus-2: $0.23$0$0.10$0.20$0.30$0.40$0.22Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh)$0.23Kimi K3 (Reasoning)
Data table: Cost per task
Cost per task
ModelDeveloperCost per taskTasks attempted
Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh), Qwen CodeAlibaba (Qwen)$0.22488 of 488 tasks
Kimi K3 (Reasoning), Terminus-2Moonshot AI$0.23488 of 488 tasks

Output tokens per task

Average output tokens per attempt, reasoning included · Lower is better

Output tokens per taskOutput tokens per task: Kimi K3 (Reasoning), Terminus-2: 6k; Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh), Qwen Code: 28k010k20k30k40k6kKimi K3 (Reasoning)28kQwen 3.8 27B (xhigh)
Data table: Output tokens per task
Output tokens per task
ModelDeveloperOutput tokens per taskTasks attempted
Kimi K3 (Reasoning), Terminus-2Moonshot AI6k488 of 488 tasks
Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh), Qwen CodeAlibaba (Qwen)28k488 of 488 tasks

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Kimi K3 (Reasoning), Terminus-2 or Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh), Qwen Code?
Kimi K3 (Reasoning), Terminus-2, 72 to 68. Both have attempted all 488 tasks.
Which is cheaper per task, Kimi K3 (Reasoning), Terminus-2 or Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh), Qwen Code?
Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh), Qwen Code, $0.22 to $0.23.
Which writes fewer output tokens per task, Kimi K3 (Reasoning), Terminus-2 or Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh), Qwen Code?
Kimi K3 (Reasoning), Terminus-2, 6k to 28k.
Which has the larger context window, Kimi K3 (Reasoning), Terminus-2 or Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh), Qwen Code?
Kimi K3 (Reasoning), Terminus-2, 1,000,000 tokens to 262,144 tokens.

More: Kimi K3 (Reasoning), Terminus-2 · Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh), Qwen Code · All comparisons