Terminus-2 – Kimi K3 (always on) vs. Terminus-2 – Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh): geospatial agent comparison
Comparison between Terminus-2 – Kimi K3 (always on) and Terminus-2 – Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh) on the Geospatial Agent Index, each benchmark, cost, time and token use, from the same tasks, agent and limits. Methodology.
Side by side
| Metric | Terminus-2 – Kimi K3 (always on) | Terminus-2 – Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh) |
|---|---|---|
| Geospatial Agent Index | 58* | 28* (partial: attempt 1 on 36 of 320 tasks) |
| Earth-Bench V2 score | 61 | 28 |
| GeoBenchX score | 55 | No data |
| GeoAgentBench score (guided GIS workflow; outside the index) | 94 | 58 |
| GeoAnalystBench score (guided GIS workflow; outside the index) | 89 | 80 |
| Raster and remote sensing score | 59 | 25 |
| Vector and overlay score | 33 | No data |
| Networks and routing score | No data | No data |
| Climate and time series score | 66 | 33 |
| Spatial statistics and interpolation score | 50 | No data |
| Mapping and cartography score | 78 | No data |
| Recognising infeasible requests score | 38 | No data |
| Cost per task | $0.336 | $0.051 |
| Time per task | 3.9 min | 21.1 min |
| Tokens per attempt | 76k | 60k |
| Turns per attempt | 7.7 | 6.8 |
| Attempts decided | 320 | 36 |
| Input price per 1M tokens | $3.00 | $0.45 |
| Output price per 1M tokens | $15.00 | $3.20 |
| Context window | 1,000,000 | 262,144 |
| Image input | Yes | Yes |
| Developer | Moonshot AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
Charts
Partial coverage. Terminus-2 – Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh): 36 of 147 Earth-Bench V2 tasks; 0 of 173 GeoBenchX tasks. Grey placeholders identify these entries in the index, cost and time charts; their height does not represent a value. Comparable bars appear when first-attempt coverage is complete. Their available results remain in the side-by-side table.
Geospatial Agent Index
Equal-weight average of the evaluation scores, 0 to 100 · Higher is better
First eight selected entries in metric order. Full results in table view.
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
| Model | Creator | Geospatial Agent Index | Range while attempts are pending | Benchmarks covered | Coverage (attempts) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Terminus-2 – Kimi K3 (always on) | Moonshot AI | 58* | No pending judgements; coverage incomplete; 1 trace review declined by the judge | 2 of 2 | 320 of 614 planned attempts |
Cost per task
Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better
First eight selected entries in metric order. Full results in table view.
How to read this chart
Not shown: partial coverage. Terminus-2 – Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh).
Data table: Cost per task
| Model | Creator | Cost per task | Coverage (attempts) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terminus-2 – Kimi K3 (always on) | Moonshot AI | $0.336 | 320 of 614 planned attempts |
Time per task
Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better
First eight selected entries in metric order. Full results in table view.
How to read this chart
Not shown: partial coverage. Terminus-2 – Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh).
Data table: Time per task
| Model | Creator | Time per task | Coverage (attempts) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terminus-2 – Kimi K3 (always on) | Moonshot AI | 3.9 min | 320 of 614 planned attempts |
Frequently asked questions
Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Terminus-2 – Kimi K3 (always on) or Terminus-2 – Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh)?
Which is cheaper per task, Terminus-2 – Kimi K3 (always on) or Terminus-2 – Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh)?
Which is faster per task, Terminus-2 – Kimi K3 (always on) or Terminus-2 – Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh)?
Which has the larger context window, Terminus-2 – Kimi K3 (always on) or Terminus-2 – Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh)?
More: Terminus-2 – Kimi K3 (always on) · Terminus-2 – Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh) · all comparisons