Axis Spatial

Kimi K3 (Reasoning), Terminus-2 vs. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B (Reasoning), Terminus-2

Kimi K3 (Reasoning), Terminus-2 against Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B (Reasoning), Terminus-2: Geospatial Agent Index, each evaluation, cost, time and tokens, on the same tasks and limits. Methodology.

Side by side

Kimi K3 (Reasoning), Terminus-2 vs. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B (Reasoning), Terminus-2
MetricKimi K3 (Reasoning), Terminus-2Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B (Reasoning), Terminus-2
Geospatial Agent Index: Text only7252
Geospatial Agent Index: Text + visionNo dataNo data
Earth-Bench V2 score7246
GeoBenchX score6453
GS-QA2 score8059
Vision agents scoreNo dataNo data
GeoAgentBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)9468
GeoAnalystBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)8937
OGD4All score (standalone; in no index)No dataNo data
GeoNatureAgent score (standalone; in no index)No dataNo data
MultiGlobeQA score (standalone; in no index)No dataNo data
GeoAgentEval score (standalone; in no index)No dataNo data
Remote sensing and raster analysis score8061
GIS analysis score7651
Climate and time series score7146
Spatial statistics score5431
Making maps score8167
Recognising infeasible requests score5043
Cost per task$0.23$0.0096
Time per task (at 100 output tokens/s)2.7 min3.8 min
Tokens per attempt53k98k
Turns per attempt7.210.1
Input price per 1M tokens$3.00$0.15
Output price per 1M tokens$15.00$0.50
Context window1,000,000262,144
Image inputYesYes
DeveloperMoonshot AINVIDIA

Charts

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal average of Earth-Bench V2, GeoBenchX and GS-QA2, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

Geospatial Agent IndexScores 0 to 100: Kimi K3 (Reasoning), Terminus-2: 72; Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B (Reasoning), Terminus-2: 52025507510072Kimi K3 (Reasoning)52Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B (Reasoning)
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
Geospatial Agent Index
ModelDeveloperGeospatial Agent Index
Kimi K3 (Reasoning), Terminus-2Moonshot AI72
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B (Reasoning), Terminus-2NVIDIA52

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

Cost per taskCost per task in US dollars: Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B (Reasoning), Terminus-2: $0.0096; Kimi K3 (Reasoning), Terminus-2: $0.23$0$0.10$0.20$0.30$0.40$0.0096Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B (Reasoning)$0.23Kimi K3 (Reasoning)
Data table: Cost per task
Cost per task
ModelDeveloperCost per task
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B (Reasoning), Terminus-2NVIDIA$0.0096
Kimi K3 (Reasoning), Terminus-2Moonshot AI$0.23

Output tokens per task

Average output tokens per attempt, reasoning included · Lower is better

Output tokens per taskOutput tokens per task: Kimi K3 (Reasoning), Terminus-2: 6k; Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B (Reasoning), Terminus-2: 7k02k4k6k8k6kKimi K3 (Reasoning)7kNemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B (Reasoning)
Data table: Output tokens per task
Output tokens per task
ModelDeveloperOutput tokens per task
Kimi K3 (Reasoning), Terminus-2Moonshot AI6k
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B (Reasoning), Terminus-2NVIDIA7k

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Kimi K3 (Reasoning), Terminus-2 or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B (Reasoning), Terminus-2?
Kimi K3 (Reasoning), Terminus-2, 72 to 52.
Which is cheaper per task, Kimi K3 (Reasoning), Terminus-2 or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B (Reasoning), Terminus-2?
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B (Reasoning), Terminus-2, $0.0096 to $0.23.
Which writes fewer output tokens per task, Kimi K3 (Reasoning), Terminus-2 or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B (Reasoning), Terminus-2?
Kimi K3 (Reasoning), Terminus-2, 6k to 7k.
Which has the larger context window, Kimi K3 (Reasoning), Terminus-2 or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B (Reasoning), Terminus-2?
Kimi K3 (Reasoning), Terminus-2, 1,000,000 tokens to 262,144 tokens.

More: Kimi K3 (Reasoning), Terminus-2 · Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B (Reasoning), Terminus-2 · All comparisons