Axis Spatial

Kimi K3 (Reasoning), Terminus-2 vs. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2

Kimi K3 (Reasoning), Terminus-2 against Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2: Geospatial Agent Index, each evaluation, cost, time and tokens, on the same tasks and limits. Methodology.

Side by side

Kimi K3 (Reasoning), Terminus-2 vs. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2
MetricKimi K3 (Reasoning), Terminus-2Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2
Geospatial Agent Index: Text only7211
Geospatial Agent Index: Text + visionNo dataNo data
Earth-Bench V2 score7216
GeoBenchX score6412
GS-QA2 score804
Vision agents scoreNo dataNo data
GeoAgentBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)9410
GeoAnalystBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)8932
OGD4All score (standalone; in no index)No dataNo data
GeoNatureAgent score (standalone; in no index)No dataNo data
MultiGlobeQA score (standalone; in no index)No dataNo data
GeoAgentEval score (standalone; in no index)No dataNo data
Remote sensing and raster analysis score8011
GIS analysis score767
Climate and time series score7115
Spatial statistics score540
Making maps score817
Recognising infeasible requests score5012
Cost per task$0.23$0.012
Time per task (at 100 output tokens/s)2.7 min4.9 min
Tokens per attempt53k249k
Turns per attempt7.217.3
Input price per 1M tokens$3.00$0.070
Output price per 1M tokens$15.00$0.20
Context window1,000,000262,144
Image inputYesNo
DeveloperMoonshot AINVIDIA

Charts

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal average of Earth-Bench V2, GeoBenchX and GS-QA2, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

Geospatial Agent IndexScores 0 to 100: Kimi K3 (Reasoning), Terminus-2: 72; Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2: 11025507510072Kimi K3 (Reasoning)11Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning)
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
Geospatial Agent Index
ModelDeveloperGeospatial Agent Index
Kimi K3 (Reasoning), Terminus-2Moonshot AI72
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2NVIDIA11

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

Cost per taskCost per task in US dollars: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2: $0.012; Kimi K3 (Reasoning), Terminus-2: $0.23$0$0.10$0.20$0.30$0.40$0.012Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning)$0.23Kimi K3 (Reasoning)
Data table: Cost per task
Cost per task
ModelDeveloperCost per task
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2NVIDIA$0.012
Kimi K3 (Reasoning), Terminus-2Moonshot AI$0.23

Output tokens per task

Average output tokens per attempt, reasoning included · Lower is better

Output tokens per taskOutput tokens per task: Kimi K3 (Reasoning), Terminus-2: 6k; Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2: 6k02k4k6k8k6kKimi K3 (Reasoning)6kNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning)
Data table: Output tokens per task
Output tokens per task
ModelDeveloperOutput tokens per task
Kimi K3 (Reasoning), Terminus-2Moonshot AI6k
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2NVIDIA6k

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Kimi K3 (Reasoning), Terminus-2 or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2?
Kimi K3 (Reasoning), Terminus-2, 72 to 11.
Which is cheaper per task, Kimi K3 (Reasoning), Terminus-2 or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2?
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2, $0.012 to $0.23.
Which writes fewer output tokens per task, Kimi K3 (Reasoning), Terminus-2 or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2?
Kimi K3 (Reasoning), Terminus-2, 6k to 6k.
Which has the larger context window, Kimi K3 (Reasoning), Terminus-2 or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2?
Kimi K3 (Reasoning), Terminus-2, 1,000,000 tokens to 262,144 tokens.

More: Kimi K3 (Reasoning), Terminus-2 · Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2 · All comparisons