Axis Spatial

Kimi K3 (Reasoning), Terminus-2 vs. Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code

Kimi K3 (Reasoning), Terminus-2 against Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code: Geospatial Agent Index, each evaluation, cost, time and tokens, on the same tasks and limits. The harnesses differ, so part of any gap can come from the harness. Methodology.

Side by side

Kimi K3 (Reasoning), Terminus-2 vs. Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code
MetricKimi K3 (Reasoning), Terminus-2Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code
Geospatial Agent Index: Text only7274
Geospatial Agent Index: Text + visionNo data78
Earth-Bench V2 score7259
GeoBenchX score6477
GS-QA2 score8086
Vision agents scoreNo data89
GeoAgentBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)9496
GeoAnalystBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)89100
OGD4All score (standalone; in no index)No data95
GeoNatureAgent score (standalone; in no index)No data100
MultiGlobeQA score (standalone; in no index)No data79
GeoAgentEval score (standalone; in no index)No data100
Remote sensing and raster analysis score8079
GIS analysis score7684
Climate and time series score7159
Spatial statistics score5477
Making maps score8177
Recognising infeasible requests score5077
Cost per task$0.23$0.081
Time per task (at 100 output tokens/s)2.7 min0.4 min
Tokens per attempt53k63k
Turns per attempt7.23.5
Input price per 1M tokens$3.00$4.00
Output price per 1M tokens$15.00$20.00
Context window1,000,0001,000,000
Image inputYesYes
DeveloperMoonshot AIAnthropic

Charts

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal average of Earth-Bench V2, GeoBenchX and GS-QA2, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

Geospatial Agent IndexScores 0 to 100: Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code: 74; Kimi K3 (Reasoning), Terminus-2: 72025507510074Claude Opus 5.5 (low)72Kimi K3 (Reasoning)
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
Geospatial Agent Index
ModelDeveloperGeospatial Agent Index
Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude CodeAnthropic74
Kimi K3 (Reasoning), Terminus-2Moonshot AI72

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

Cost per taskCost per task in US dollars: Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code: $0.081; Kimi K3 (Reasoning), Terminus-2: $0.23$0$0.10$0.20$0.30$0.40$0.081Claude Opus 5.5 (low)$0.23Kimi K3 (Reasoning)
Data table: Cost per task
Cost per task
ModelDeveloperCost per task
Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude CodeAnthropic$0.081
Kimi K3 (Reasoning), Terminus-2Moonshot AI$0.23

Output tokens per task

Average output tokens per attempt, reasoning included · Lower is better

Output tokens per taskOutput tokens per task: Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code: 1k; Kimi K3 (Reasoning), Terminus-2: 6k02k3k4k6k1kClaude Opus 5.5 (low)6kKimi K3 (Reasoning)
Data table: Output tokens per task
Output tokens per task
ModelDeveloperOutput tokens per task
Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude CodeAnthropic1k
Kimi K3 (Reasoning), Terminus-2Moonshot AI6k

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Kimi K3 (Reasoning), Terminus-2 or Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code?
Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code, 74 to 72.
Which is cheaper per task, Kimi K3 (Reasoning), Terminus-2 or Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code?
Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code, $0.081 to $0.23.
Which writes fewer output tokens per task, Kimi K3 (Reasoning), Terminus-2 or Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code?
Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code, 1k to 6k.
Which has the larger context window, Kimi K3 (Reasoning), Terminus-2 or Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code?
They are level, at 1,000,000 tokens.

More: Kimi K3 (Reasoning), Terminus-2 · Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code · All comparisons