Axis Spatial

Terminus-2 – Kimi K2.7 Code (always on) vs. Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high): geospatial agent comparison

Comparison between Terminus-2 – Kimi K2.7 Code (always on) and Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high) on the Geospatial Agent Index, each benchmark, cost, time and token use, from the same tasks, agent and limits. Methodology.

Side by side

Terminus-2 – Kimi K2.7 Code (always on) vs. Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high)
MetricTerminus-2 – Kimi K2.7 Code (always on)Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high)
Geospatial Agent Index7481* (partial: 1.9 of 3 attempts)
GeoAgentBench score91100
GeoBenchX score5467
Earth-Bench score6258
GeoAnalystBench score8897
Raster and remote sensing score7479
Vector and overlay score7881
Networks and routing score87100
Climate and time series score7879
Spatial statistics and interpolation score6073
Mapping and cartography score7276
Recognising infeasible requests score4161
Cost per task$0.119$0.062
Time per task6.5 min0.7 min
Tokens per attempt290k95k
Turns per attempt14.14.6
Attempts decided870479
Input price per 1M tokens$0.95$2.00
Output price per 1M tokens$4.00$10.00
Context window262,144No data
Image inputYesNo data
DeveloperMoonshot AIAnthropic

Charts

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal-weight average of the evaluation scores, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

  • Partial coverage
Geospatial Agent IndexClaude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high): 81* (partial coverage); Terminus-2 – Kimi K2.7 Code (always on): 74025507510081*Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high)74Kimi K2.7 Code (always on)
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
Geospatial Agent Index
ModelCreatorGeospatial Agent IndexRange while attempts are pendingBenchmarks coveredCoverage (attempts)
Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high)Anthropic81* (partial: 1.9 of 3 attempts)71 to 824 of 4479 of 870 planned attempts (236 excluded)
Terminus-2 – Kimi K2.7 Code (always on)Moonshot AI74No pending judgements4 of 4870 of 870 planned attempts

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

  • Partial coverage
Cost per taskClaude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high): $0.062 (partial coverage); Terminus-2 – Kimi K2.7 Code (always on): $0.119$0$0.030$0.060$0.090$0.120$0.062Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high)$0.119Kimi K2.7 Code (always on)
Data table: Cost per task
Cost per task
ModelCreatorCost per taskCoverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – Kimi K2.7 Code (always on)Moonshot AI$0.119870 of 870 planned attempts
Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high)Anthropic$0.062543 of 870 planned attempts (236 excluded)

Time per task

Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better

  • Partial coverage
Time per taskClaude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high): 0.7 min (partial coverage); Terminus-2 – Kimi K2.7 Code (always on): 6.5 min0m2m3m5m7m0.7 minClaude Sonnet 5.5 (high)6.5 minKimi K2.7 Code (always on)
Data table: Time per task
Time per task
ModelCreatorTime per taskCoverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – Kimi K2.7 Code (always on)Moonshot AI6.5 min870 of 870 planned attempts
Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high)Anthropic0.7 min543 of 870 planned attempts (236 excluded)

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Terminus-2 – Kimi K2.7 Code (always on) or Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high)?
Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high), at 81 against 74 for Terminus-2 – Kimi K2.7 Code (always on). Terminus-2 – Kimi K2.7 Code (always on): 870 of 870 planned attempts. Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high): 479 of 870 planned attempts (236 excluded). Coverage is partial; scores can change as more attempts are decided.
Which is cheaper per task, Terminus-2 – Kimi K2.7 Code (always on) or Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high)?
Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high), at $0.062 against $0.119 for Terminus-2 – Kimi K2.7 Code (always on).
Which is faster per task, Terminus-2 – Kimi K2.7 Code (always on) or Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high)?
Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high), at 0.7 min against 6.5 min for Terminus-2 – Kimi K2.7 Code (always on).
Which has the larger context window, Terminus-2 – Kimi K2.7 Code (always on) or Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high)?
Not known yet: Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high) has no context window data.

More: Terminus-2 – Kimi K2.7 Code (always on) · Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high) · all comparisons