Axis Spatial

gpt-oss-20b (high), Terminus-2 vs. Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh), Qwen Code

gpt-oss-20b (high), Terminus-2 against Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh), Qwen Code: Geospatial Agent Index, each evaluation, cost, time and tokens, on the same tasks and limits. The harnesses differ, so part of any gap can come from the harness. Methodology.

Side by side

gpt-oss-20b (high), Terminus-2 vs. Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh), Qwen Code
Metricgpt-oss-20b (high), Terminus-2Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh), Qwen Code
Geospatial Agent Index: Text only3368
Geospatial Agent Index: Text + visionNo image inputNot run: Vision agents
Earth-Bench V2 score3268
GeoBenchX score3862
GS-QA2 score3075
Vision agents scoreNo image inputNo data
GeoAgentBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)5394
GeoAnalystBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)3779
Raster and remote sensing score3376
Vector and overlay score2675
Climate and time series score3161
Spatial statistics and interpolation score054
Mapping and cartography score2163
Recognising infeasible requests score6760
Cost per task$0.017$0.22
Time per task (at 100 output tokens/s)7.2 min4.7 min (estimated)
Tokens per attempt67k840k
Turns per attempt5.217.6
Attempts scored488488
Input price per 1M tokens$0.20$0.45
Output price per 1M tokens$0.30$3.20
Context window128,000262,144
Image inputNoYes
DeveloperOpenAIAlibaba (Qwen)

Charts

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal average of Earth-Bench V2, GeoBenchX and GS-QA2, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

Geospatial Agent IndexScores 0 to 100: Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh), Qwen Code: 68; gpt-oss-20b (high), Terminus-2: 33025507510068Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh)33gpt-oss-20b (high)
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
Geospatial Agent Index
ModelDeveloperGeospatial Agent IndexStatusEvaluations scoredTasks attempted
Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh), Qwen CodeAlibaba (Qwen)68Complete3 of 3488 of 488 tasks
gpt-oss-20b (high), Terminus-2OpenAI33Complete3 of 3488 of 488 tasks

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

Cost per taskCost per task in US dollars: gpt-oss-20b (high), Terminus-2: $0.017; Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh), Qwen Code: $0.22$0$0.10$0.20$0.30$0.40$0.017gpt-oss-20b (high)$0.22Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh)
Data table: Cost per task
Cost per task
ModelDeveloperCost per taskTasks attempted
gpt-oss-20b (high), Terminus-2OpenAI$0.017488 of 488 tasks
Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh), Qwen CodeAlibaba (Qwen)$0.22488 of 488 tasks

Output tokens per task

Average output tokens per attempt, reasoning included · Lower is better

Output tokens per taskOutput tokens per task: Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh), Qwen Code: 28k; gpt-oss-20b (high), Terminus-2: 40k010k20k30k40k28kQwen 3.8 27B (xhigh)40kgpt-oss-20b (high)
Data table: Output tokens per task
Output tokens per task
ModelDeveloperOutput tokens per taskTasks attempted
Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh), Qwen CodeAlibaba (Qwen)28k488 of 488 tasks
gpt-oss-20b (high), Terminus-2OpenAI40k488 of 488 tasks

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, gpt-oss-20b (high), Terminus-2 or Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh), Qwen Code?
Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh), Qwen Code, 68 to 33. Both have attempted all 488 tasks.
Which is cheaper per task, gpt-oss-20b (high), Terminus-2 or Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh), Qwen Code?
gpt-oss-20b (high), Terminus-2, $0.017 to $0.22.
Which writes fewer output tokens per task, gpt-oss-20b (high), Terminus-2 or Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh), Qwen Code?
Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh), Qwen Code, 28k to 40k.
Which has the larger context window, gpt-oss-20b (high), Terminus-2 or Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh), Qwen Code?
Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh), Qwen Code, 262,144 tokens to 128,000 tokens.

More: gpt-oss-20b (high), Terminus-2 · Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh), Qwen Code · All comparisons