Terminus-2 – gpt-oss-20b (high) vs. Terminus-2 – Kimi K3 (always on): geospatial agent comparison

Comparison between Terminus-2 – gpt-oss-20b (high) and Terminus-2 – Kimi K3 (always on) on the Geospatial Agent Index, each benchmark, cost, time and token use, from the same tasks, agent and limits. Methodology.

Side by side

Terminus-2 – gpt-oss-20b (high) vs. Terminus-2 – Kimi K3 (always on)
Metric	Terminus-2 – gpt-oss-20b (high)	Terminus-2 – Kimi K3 (always on)
Geospatial Agent Index	28*	58*
Earth-Bench V2 score	24	61
GeoBenchX score	31	55
GeoAgentBench score (guided GIS workflow; outside the index)	53	94
GeoAnalystBench score (guided GIS workflow; outside the index)	37	89
Raster and remote sensing score	24	59
Vector and overlay score	33	33
Networks and routing score	No data	No data
Climate and time series score	24	66
Spatial statistics and interpolation score	0	50
Mapping and cartography score	16	78
Recognising infeasible requests score	51	38
Cost per task	$0.016	$0.336
Time per task	14.8 min	3.9 min
Tokens per attempt	63k	76k
Turns per attempt	5.3	7.7
Attempts decided	319	320
Input price per 1M tokens	$0.20	$3.00
Output price per 1M tokens	$0.30	$15.00
Context window	128,000	1,000,000
Image input	No	Yes
Developer	OpenAI	Moonshot AI

Charts

Partial coverage. Terminus-2 – gpt-oss-20b (high): 172 of 173 GeoBenchX tasks. Grey placeholders identify these entries in the index, cost and time charts; their height does not represent a value. Comparable bars appear when first-attempt coverage is complete. Their available results remain in the side-by-side table.

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal-weight average of the evaluation scores, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

Planned attempts still to come

Data table: Geospatial Agent Index

Geospatial Agent Index
Model	Creator	Geospatial Agent Index	Range while attempts are pending	Benchmarks covered	Coverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – Kimi K3 (always on)	Moonshot AI	58*	No pending judgements; coverage incomplete; 1 trace review declined by the judge	2 of 2	320 of 614 planned attempts

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

Planned attempts still to come

How to read this chart

Not shown: partial coverage. Terminus-2 – gpt-oss-20b (high).

Data table: Cost per task

Cost per task
Model	Creator	Cost per task	Coverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – Kimi K3 (always on)	Moonshot AI	$0.336	320 of 614 planned attempts

Time per task

Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better

Planned attempts still to come

How to read this chart

Not shown: partial coverage. Terminus-2 – gpt-oss-20b (high).

Data table: Time per task

Time per task
Model	Creator	Time per task	Coverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – Kimi K3 (always on)	Moonshot AI	3.9 min	320 of 614 planned attempts

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Terminus-2 – gpt-oss-20b (high) or Terminus-2 – Kimi K3 (always on)?

Not comparable yet: Terminus-2 – gpt-oss-20b (high) has partial coverage (172 of 173 GeoBenchX tasks), so it is not ranked. Terminus-2 – gpt-oss-20b (high): 319 of 614 planned attempts (1 excluded). Terminus-2 – Kimi K3 (always on): 320 of 614 planned attempts. Coverage is partial; scores can change as more attempts are decided.

Which is cheaper per task, Terminus-2 – gpt-oss-20b (high) or Terminus-2 – Kimi K3 (always on)?

Terminus-2 – gpt-oss-20b (high), at $0.016 against $0.336 for Terminus-2 – Kimi K3 (always on).

Which is faster per task, Terminus-2 – gpt-oss-20b (high) or Terminus-2 – Kimi K3 (always on)?

Terminus-2 – Kimi K3 (always on), at 3.9 min against 14.8 min for Terminus-2 – gpt-oss-20b (high).

Which has the larger context window, Terminus-2 – gpt-oss-20b (high) or Terminus-2 – Kimi K3 (always on)?

Terminus-2 – Kimi K3 (always on), at 1,000,000 tokens against 128,000 tokens for Terminus-2 – gpt-oss-20b (high).

More: Terminus-2 – gpt-oss-20b (high) · Terminus-2 – Kimi K3 (always on) · all comparisons