Axis Spatial

gpt-oss-120b (low), Terminus-2 vs. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2

gpt-oss-120b (low), Terminus-2 against Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2: Geospatial Agent Index, each evaluation, cost, time and tokens, on the same tasks and limits. Methodology.

Side by side

gpt-oss-120b (low), Terminus-2 vs. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2
Metricgpt-oss-120b (low), Terminus-2Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2
Geospatial Agent Index: Text only3120
Geospatial Agent Index: Text + visionNo image inputNo data
Earth-Bench V2 score2829
GeoBenchX score3721
GS-QA2 score299
Vision agents scoreNo image inputNo data
GeoAgentBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)6026
GeoAnalystBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)4716
OGD4All score (standalone; in no index)No dataNo data
GeoNatureAgent score (standalone; in no index)No dataNo data
MultiGlobeQA score (standalone; in no index)No dataNo data
GeoAgentEval score (standalone; in no index)No dataNo data
Remote sensing and raster analysis score2517
GIS analysis score346
Climate and time series score2927
Spatial statistics score80
Making maps score2116
Recognising infeasible requests score6033
Cost per task$0.0046$0.13
Time per task (at 100 output tokens/s)0.5 min4.9 min
Tokens per attempt11k589k
Turns per attempt2.930.7
Input price per 1M tokens$0.35$0.20
Output price per 1M tokens$0.75$0.80
Context window128,000256,000
Image inputNoYes
DeveloperOpenAINVIDIA

Charts

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal average of Earth-Bench V2, GeoBenchX and GS-QA2, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

Geospatial Agent IndexScores 0 to 100: gpt-oss-120b (low), Terminus-2: 31; Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2: 20025507510031gpt-oss-120b (low)20Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning)
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
Geospatial Agent Index
ModelDeveloperGeospatial Agent Index
gpt-oss-120b (low), Terminus-2OpenAI31
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2NVIDIA20

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

Cost per taskCost per task in US dollars: gpt-oss-120b (low), Terminus-2: $0.0046; Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2: $0.13$0$0.05$0.10$0.15$0.20$0.0046gpt-oss-120b (low)$0.13Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning)
Data table: Cost per task
Cost per task
ModelDeveloperCost per task
gpt-oss-120b (low), Terminus-2OpenAI$0.0046
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2NVIDIA$0.13

Output tokens per task

Average output tokens per attempt, reasoning included · Lower is better

Output tokens per taskOutput tokens per task: gpt-oss-120b (low), Terminus-2: 2k; Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2: 22k010k20k30k40k2kgpt-oss-120b (low)22kNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning)
Data table: Output tokens per task
Output tokens per task
ModelDeveloperOutput tokens per task
gpt-oss-120b (low), Terminus-2OpenAI2k
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2NVIDIA22k

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, gpt-oss-120b (low), Terminus-2 or Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2?
gpt-oss-120b (low), Terminus-2, 31 to 20.
Which is cheaper per task, gpt-oss-120b (low), Terminus-2 or Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2?
gpt-oss-120b (low), Terminus-2, $0.0046 to $0.13.
Which writes fewer output tokens per task, gpt-oss-120b (low), Terminus-2 or Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2?
gpt-oss-120b (low), Terminus-2, 2k to 22k.
Which has the larger context window, gpt-oss-120b (low), Terminus-2 or Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2?
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2, 256,000 tokens to 128,000 tokens.

More: gpt-oss-120b (low), Terminus-2 · Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2 · All comparisons