Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3 (low) vs. Terminus-2 – Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning): geospatial agent comparison
Comparison between Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3 (low) and Terminus-2 – Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning) on the Geospatial Agent Index, each benchmark, cost, time and token use, from the same tasks, agent and limits. Methodology.
Side by side
| Metric | Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3 (low) | Terminus-2 – Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Geospatial Agent Index | 72* (attempts per task: 1) | 0* (attempts per task: 1 on 9 of 290 tasks so far) |
| GeoAgentBench score | 94 | No data |
| GeoBenchX score | 54 | No data |
| Earth-Bench score | 40 | 0 |
| GeoAnalystBench score | 100 | No data |
| Raster and remote sensing score | 67 | 0 |
| Vector and overlay score | 82 | No data |
| Networks and routing score | 100 | No data |
| Climate and time series score | 67 | 0 |
| Spatial statistics and interpolation score | 48 | No data |
| Mapping and cartography score | 74 | No data |
| Recognising infeasible requests score | 41 | No data |
| Cost per task | $0.251 | $0.247 |
| Time per task | 6.8 min | 15.6 min |
| Tokens per attempt | 205k | 693k |
| Turns per attempt | 10.8 | 25.7 |
| Attempts decided | 285 | 9 |
| Input price per 1M tokens | $1.40 | $0.35 |
| Output price per 1M tokens | $4.40 | $0.56 |
| Context window | 1,048,576 | 128,000 |
| Image input | No | Yes |
| Developer | Z.ai | Mistral AI |
Charts
Geospatial Agent Index
Equal-weight average of the evaluation scores, 0 to 100 · Higher is better
First eight selected entries in metric order. Full results in table view.
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
| Model | Creator | Geospatial Agent Index | Range while attempts are pending | Benchmarks covered | Coverage (attempts) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3 (low) | Z.ai | 72* (attempts per task: 1) | 70 to 72 | 4 of 4 | 285 of 290 planned attempts |
| Terminus-2 – Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning) | Mistral AI | 0* (attempts per task: 1 on 9 of 290 tasks so far) | No pending judgements; coverage incomplete | 1 of 4 | 9 of 351 planned attempts |
Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3 (low)Cost per task
Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better
First eight selected entries in metric order. Full results in table view.
Data table: Cost per task
| Model | Creator | Cost per task | Coverage (attempts) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3 (low) | Z.ai | $0.251 | 290 of 290 planned attempts |
| Terminus-2 – Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning) | Mistral AI | $0.247 | 9 of 351 planned attempts |
Time per task
Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better
First eight selected entries in metric order. Full results in table view.
Data table: Time per task
| Model | Creator | Time per task | Coverage (attempts) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3 (low) | Z.ai | 6.8 min | 290 of 290 planned attempts |
| Terminus-2 – Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning) | Mistral AI | 15.6 min | 9 of 351 planned attempts |
Frequently asked questions
- Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3 (low) or Terminus-2 – Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning)?
- Not comparable yet: Terminus-2 – Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning) has scores on 1 of 4 benchmarks, so it is not yet ranked. Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3 (low): 285 of 290 planned attempts. Terminus-2 – Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning): 9 of 351 planned attempts. Coverage is partial; scores can change as more attempts are decided.
- Which is cheaper per task, Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3 (low) or Terminus-2 – Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning)?
- Terminus-2 – Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning), at $0.247 against $0.251 for Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3 (low).
- Which is faster per task, Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3 (low) or Terminus-2 – Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning)?
- Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3 (low), at 6.8 min against 15.6 min for Terminus-2 – Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning).
- Which has the larger context window, Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3 (low) or Terminus-2 – Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning)?
- Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3 (low), at 1,048,576 tokens against 128,000 tokens for Terminus-2 – Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning).
More: Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3 (low) · Terminus-2 – Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning) · all comparisons