Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (max) or Terminus-2 – Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh)?

Not comparable yet: Terminus-2 – Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh) has scores on 3 of 4 benchmarks, so it is not yet ranked. Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (max): 298 of 870 planned attempts. Terminus-2 – Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh): 101 of 870 planned attempts. Coverage is partial; scores can change as more attempts are decided.

Which is cheaper per task, Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (max) or Terminus-2 – Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh)?

Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (max), at $0.042 against $0.066 for Terminus-2 – Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh).

Which is faster per task, Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (max) or Terminus-2 – Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh)?

Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (max), at 17.3 min against 19.8 min for Terminus-2 – Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh).

Which has the larger context window, Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (max) or Terminus-2 – Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh)?

Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (max), at 1,048,576 tokens against 262,144 tokens for Terminus-2 – Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh).

Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (max) vs. Terminus-2 – Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh): geospatial agent comparison

Comparison between Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (max) and Terminus-2 – Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh) on the Geospatial Agent Index, each benchmark, cost, time and token use, from the same tasks, agent and limits. Methodology.

Side by side

Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (max) vs. Terminus-2 – Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh)
Metric	Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (max)	Terminus-2 – Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh)
Geospatial Agent Index	56* (partial: 1.1 of 3 attempts)	62* (partial: 0.3 of 3 attempts)
GeoAgentBench score	82	60
GeoBenchX score	32	No data
Earth-Bench score	29	27
GeoAnalystBench score	79	100
Raster and remote sensing score	51	36
Vector and overlay score	64	78
Networks and routing score	60	67
Climate and time series score	54	43
Spatial statistics and interpolation score	35	62
Mapping and cartography score	43	100
Recognising infeasible requests score	30	No data
Cost per task	$0.042	$0.066
Time per task	17.3 min	19.8 min
Tokens per attempt	374k	90k
Turns per attempt	13.4	8.2
Attempts decided	298	101
Input price per 1M tokens	$0.15	$0.45
Output price per 1M tokens	$0.50	$3.20
Context window	1,048,576	262,144
Image input	Yes	Yes
Developer	Z.ai	Alibaba (Qwen)

Charts

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal-weight average of the evaluation scores, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

Partial coverage

Data table: Geospatial Agent Index

Geospatial Agent Index
Model	Creator	Geospatial Agent Index	Range while attempts are pending	Benchmarks covered	Coverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (max)	Z.ai	56* (partial: 1.1 of 3 attempts)	54 to 56	4 of 4	298 of 870 planned attempts
Terminus-2 – Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh)	Alibaba (Qwen)	62* (partial: 0.3 of 3 attempts)	No pending judgements; coverage incomplete	3 of 4	101 of 870 planned attempts

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

Partial coverage

Data table: Cost per task

Cost per task
Model	Creator	Cost per task	Coverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (max)	Z.ai	$0.042	315 of 870 planned attempts
Terminus-2 – Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh)	Alibaba (Qwen)	$0.066	101 of 870 planned attempts

Time per task

Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better

Partial coverage

Data table: Time per task

Time per task
Model	Creator	Time per task	Coverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (max)	Z.ai	17.3 min	315 of 870 planned attempts
Terminus-2 – Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh)	Alibaba (Qwen)	19.8 min	101 of 870 planned attempts

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (max) or Terminus-2 – Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh)?: Not comparable yet: Terminus-2 – Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh) has scores on 3 of 4 benchmarks, so it is not yet ranked. Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (max): 298 of 870 planned attempts. Terminus-2 – Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh): 101 of 870 planned attempts. Coverage is partial; scores can change as more attempts are decided.
Which is cheaper per task, Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (max) or Terminus-2 – Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh)?: Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (max), at $0.042 against $0.066 for Terminus-2 – Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh).
Which is faster per task, Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (max) or Terminus-2 – Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh)?: Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (max), at 17.3 min against 19.8 min for Terminus-2 – Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh).
Which has the larger context window, Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (max) or Terminus-2 – Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh)?: Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (max), at 1,048,576 tokens against 262,144 tokens for Terminus-2 – Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh).

More: Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (max) · Terminus-2 – Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh) · all comparisons