Axis Spatial

GLM-5.3-Flash (max), Terminus-2 vs. Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code

GLM-5.3-Flash (max), Terminus-2 against Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code: Geospatial Agent Index, each evaluation, cost, time and tokens, on the same tasks and limits. The harnesses differ, so part of any gap can come from the harness. Methodology.

Side by side

GLM-5.3-Flash (max), Terminus-2 vs. Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code
MetricGLM-5.3-Flash (max), Terminus-2Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code
Geospatial Agent Index: Text only6374
Geospatial Agent Index: Text + visionNo data78
Earth-Bench V2 score5159
GeoBenchX score5777
GS-QA2 score8086
Vision agents scoreNo data89
GeoAgentBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)8496
GeoAnalystBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)84100
OGD4All score (standalone; in no index)No data95
GeoNatureAgent score (standalone; in no index)No data100
MultiGlobeQA score (standalone; in no index)No data79
GeoAgentEval score (standalone; in no index)No data100
Remote sensing and raster analysis score6779
GIS analysis score8684
Climate and time series score5159
Spatial statistics score3877
Making maps score6777
Recognising infeasible requests score4877
Cost per task$0.094$0.081
Time per task (at 100 output tokens/s)8.5 min0.4 min
Tokens per attempt817k63k
Turns per attempt15.83.5
Input price per 1M tokens$0.15$4.00
Output price per 1M tokens$0.50$20.00
Context window1,048,5761,000,000
Image inputYesYes
DeveloperZ.aiAnthropic

Charts

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal average of Earth-Bench V2, GeoBenchX and GS-QA2, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

Geospatial Agent IndexScores 0 to 100: Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code: 74; GLM-5.3-Flash (max), Terminus-2: 63025507510074Claude Opus 5.5 (low)63GLM-5.3-Flash (max)
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
Geospatial Agent Index
ModelDeveloperGeospatial Agent Index
Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude CodeAnthropic74
GLM-5.3-Flash (max), Terminus-2Z.ai63

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

Cost per taskCost per task in US dollars: Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code: $0.081; GLM-5.3-Flash (max), Terminus-2: $0.094$0$0.025$0.05$0.075$0.10$0.081Claude Opus 5.5 (low)$0.094GLM-5.3-Flash (max)
Data table: Cost per task
Cost per task
ModelDeveloperCost per task
Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude CodeAnthropic$0.081
GLM-5.3-Flash (max), Terminus-2Z.ai$0.094

Output tokens per task

Average output tokens per attempt, reasoning included · Lower is better

Output tokens per taskOutput tokens per task: Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code: 1k; GLM-5.3-Flash (max), Terminus-2: 30k010k20k30k40k1kClaude Opus 5.5 (low)30kGLM-5.3-Flash (max)
Data table: Output tokens per task
Output tokens per task
ModelDeveloperOutput tokens per task
Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude CodeAnthropic1k
GLM-5.3-Flash (max), Terminus-2Z.ai30k

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, GLM-5.3-Flash (max), Terminus-2 or Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code?
Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code, 74 to 63.
Which is cheaper per task, GLM-5.3-Flash (max), Terminus-2 or Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code?
Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code, $0.081 to $0.094.
Which writes fewer output tokens per task, GLM-5.3-Flash (max), Terminus-2 or Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code?
Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code, 1k to 30k.
Which has the larger context window, GLM-5.3-Flash (max), Terminus-2 or Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code?
GLM-5.3-Flash (max), Terminus-2, 1,048,576 tokens to 1,000,000 tokens.

More: GLM-5.3-Flash (max), Terminus-2 · Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code · All comparisons