Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low) or Terminus-2 – Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh)?

Not comparable yet: Terminus-2 – Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh) has scores on 3 of 4 benchmarks, so it is not yet ranked. Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low): 288 of 870 planned attempts (3 excluded). Terminus-2 – Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh): 101 of 870 planned attempts. Coverage is partial; scores can change as more attempts are decided.

Which is cheaper per task, Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low) or Terminus-2 – Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh)?

Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low), at $0.028 against $0.066 for Terminus-2 – Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh).

Which is faster per task, Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low) or Terminus-2 – Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh)?

Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low), at 9.8 min against 19.8 min for Terminus-2 – Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh).

Which has the larger context window, Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low) or Terminus-2 – Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh)?

Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low), at 1,048,576 tokens against 262,144 tokens for Terminus-2 – Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh).

Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low) vs. Terminus-2 – Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh): geospatial agent comparison

Comparison between Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low) and Terminus-2 – Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh) on the Geospatial Agent Index, each benchmark, cost, time and token use, from the same tasks, agent and limits. Methodology.

Side by side

Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low) vs. Terminus-2 – Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh)
Metric	Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low)	Terminus-2 – Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh)
Geospatial Agent Index	66* (partial: 1.1 of 3 attempts)	62* (partial: 0.3 of 3 attempts)
GeoAgentBench score	94	60
GeoBenchX score	47	No data
Earth-Bench score	27	27
GeoAnalystBench score	94	100
Raster and remote sensing score	61	36
Vector and overlay score	69	78
Networks and routing score	100	67
Climate and time series score	54	43
Spatial statistics and interpolation score	48	62
Mapping and cartography score	67	100
Recognising infeasible requests score	35	No data
Cost per task	$0.028	$0.066
Time per task	9.8 min	19.8 min
Tokens per attempt	278k	90k
Turns per attempt	12.1	8.2
Attempts decided	288	101
Input price per 1M tokens	$0.15	$0.45
Output price per 1M tokens	$0.50	$3.20
Context window	1,048,576	262,144
Image input	Yes	Yes
Developer	Z.ai	Alibaba (Qwen)

Charts

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal-weight average of the evaluation scores, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

Partial coverage

Data table: Geospatial Agent Index

Geospatial Agent Index
Model	Creator	Geospatial Agent Index	Range while attempts are pending	Benchmarks covered	Coverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low)	Z.ai	66* (partial: 1.1 of 3 attempts)	59 to 67	4 of 4	288 of 870 planned attempts (3 excluded)
Terminus-2 – Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh)	Alibaba (Qwen)	62* (partial: 0.3 of 3 attempts)	No pending judgements; coverage incomplete	3 of 4	101 of 870 planned attempts

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

Partial coverage

Data table: Cost per task

Cost per task
Model	Creator	Cost per task	Coverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low)	Z.ai	$0.028	325 of 870 planned attempts (3 excluded)
Terminus-2 – Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh)	Alibaba (Qwen)	$0.066	101 of 870 planned attempts

Time per task

Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better

Partial coverage

Data table: Time per task

Time per task
Model	Creator	Time per task	Coverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low)	Z.ai	9.8 min	325 of 870 planned attempts (3 excluded)
Terminus-2 – Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh)	Alibaba (Qwen)	19.8 min	101 of 870 planned attempts

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low) or Terminus-2 – Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh)?: Not comparable yet: Terminus-2 – Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh) has scores on 3 of 4 benchmarks, so it is not yet ranked. Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low): 288 of 870 planned attempts (3 excluded). Terminus-2 – Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh): 101 of 870 planned attempts. Coverage is partial; scores can change as more attempts are decided.
Which is cheaper per task, Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low) or Terminus-2 – Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh)?: Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low), at $0.028 against $0.066 for Terminus-2 – Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh).
Which is faster per task, Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low) or Terminus-2 – Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh)?: Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low), at 9.8 min against 19.8 min for Terminus-2 – Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh).
Which has the larger context window, Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low) or Terminus-2 – Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh)?: Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low), at 1,048,576 tokens against 262,144 tokens for Terminus-2 – Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh).

More: Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low) · Terminus-2 – Qwen 3.8 27B (xhigh) · all comparisons