Axis Spatial

Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low) vs. Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (high): geospatial agent comparison

Comparison between Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low) and Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (high) on the Geospatial Agent Index, each benchmark, cost, time and token use, from the same tasks, agent and limits. Methodology.

Side by side

Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low) vs. Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (high)
MetricTerminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low)Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (high)
Geospatial Agent Index66* (partial: 1.1 of 3 attempts)75* (partial: 1.7 of 3 attempts)
GeoAgentBench score9498
GeoBenchX score4761
Earth-Bench score2751
GeoAnalystBench score9489
Raster and remote sensing score6169
Vector and overlay score6975
Networks and routing score100100
Climate and time series score5479
Spatial statistics and interpolation score4858
Mapping and cartography score6775
Recognising infeasible requests score3556
Cost per task$0.028$0.010
Time per task9.8 min1.1 min
Tokens per attempt278k328k
Turns per attempt12.18.1
Attempts decided288422
Input price per 1M tokens$0.15$0.10
Output price per 1M tokens$0.50$0.50
Context window1,048,576No data
Image inputYesNo data
DeveloperZ.aiAnthropic

Charts

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal-weight average of the evaluation scores, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

  • Partial coverage
Geospatial Agent IndexClaude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (high): 75* (partial coverage); Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low): 66* (partial coverage)025507510075*Claude Haiku 5.5 (high)66*GLM-5.3-Flash (low)
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
Geospatial Agent Index
ModelCreatorGeospatial Agent IndexRange while attempts are pendingBenchmarks coveredCoverage (attempts)
Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (high)Anthropic75* (partial: 1.7 of 3 attempts)66 to 774 of 4422 of 870 planned attempts
Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low)Z.ai66* (partial: 1.1 of 3 attempts)59 to 674 of 4288 of 870 planned attempts (3 excluded)

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

  • Partial coverage
Cost per taskClaude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (high): $0.010 (partial coverage); Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low): $0.028 (partial coverage)$0$0.0075$0.015$0.022$0.030$0.010Claude Haiku 5.5 (high)$0.028GLM-5.3-Flash (low)
Data table: Cost per task
Cost per task
ModelCreatorCost per taskCoverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low)Z.ai$0.028325 of 870 planned attempts (3 excluded)
Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (high)Anthropic$0.010485 of 870 planned attempts

Time per task

Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better

  • Partial coverage
Time per taskClaude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (high): 1.1 min (partial coverage); Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low): 9.8 min (partial coverage)0m2m5m8m10m1.1 minClaude Haiku 5.5 (high)9.8 minGLM-5.3-Flash (low)
Data table: Time per task
Time per task
ModelCreatorTime per taskCoverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low)Z.ai9.8 min325 of 870 planned attempts (3 excluded)
Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (high)Anthropic1.1 min485 of 870 planned attempts

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low) or Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (high)?
Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (high), at 75 against 66 for Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low). Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low): 288 of 870 planned attempts (3 excluded). Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (high): 422 of 870 planned attempts. Coverage is partial; scores can change as more attempts are decided.
Which is cheaper per task, Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low) or Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (high)?
Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (high), at $0.010 against $0.028 for Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low).
Which is faster per task, Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low) or Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (high)?
Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (high), at 1.1 min against 9.8 min for Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low).
Which has the larger context window, Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low) or Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (high)?
Not known yet: Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (high) has no context window data.

More: Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low) · Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (high) · all comparisons