Axis Spatial

Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (none) vs. Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max): geospatial agent comparison

Comparison between Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (none) and Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max) on the Geospatial Agent Index, each benchmark, cost, time and token use, from the same tasks, agent and limits. Methodology.

Side by side

Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (none) vs. Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max)
MetricTerminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (none)Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max)
Geospatial Agent Index69* (partial: 1.4 of 3 attempts)75* (partial: 1.1 of 3 attempts)
GeoAgentBench score9497
GeoBenchX score5155
Earth-Bench score5152
GeoAnalystBench score7995
Raster and remote sensing score7373
Vector and overlay score6981
Networks and routing score100100
Climate and time series score5879
Spatial statistics and interpolation score5875
Mapping and cartography score7572
Recognising infeasible requests score3337
Cost per task$0.103$0.362
Time per task2.9 min9.3 min
Tokens per attempt169k363k
Turns per attempt11.312.0
Attempts decided356306
Input price per 1M tokens$1.40$1.40
Output price per 1M tokens$4.40$4.40
Context window262,144262,144
Image inputNoNo
DeveloperZ.aiZ.ai

Charts

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal-weight average of the evaluation scores, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

  • Partial coverage
Geospatial Agent IndexTerminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max): 75* (partial coverage); Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (none): 69* (partial coverage)025507510075*GLM-5.2 (max)69*GLM-5.2 (none)
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
Geospatial Agent Index
ModelCreatorGeospatial Agent IndexRange while attempts are pendingBenchmarks coveredCoverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max)Z.ai75* (partial: 1.1 of 3 attempts)72 to 754 of 4306 of 870 planned attempts
Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (none)Z.ai69* (partial: 1.4 of 3 attempts)62 to 724 of 4356 of 870 planned attempts

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

  • Partial coverage
Cost per taskTerminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (none): $0.103 (partial coverage); Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max): $0.362 (partial coverage)$0$0.100$0.200$0.300$0.400$0.103GLM-5.2 (none)$0.362GLM-5.2 (max)
Data table: Cost per task
Cost per task
ModelCreatorCost per taskCoverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (none)Z.ai$0.103408 of 870 planned attempts
Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max)Z.ai$0.362324 of 870 planned attempts

Time per task

Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better

  • Partial coverage
Time per taskTerminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (none): 2.9 min (partial coverage); Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max): 9.3 min (partial coverage)0m2m5m8m10m2.9 minGLM-5.2 (none)9.3 minGLM-5.2 (max)
Data table: Time per task
Time per task
ModelCreatorTime per taskCoverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (none)Z.ai2.9 min408 of 870 planned attempts
Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max)Z.ai9.3 min324 of 870 planned attempts

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (none) or Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max)?
Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max), at 75 against 69 for Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (none). Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (none): 356 of 870 planned attempts. Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max): 306 of 870 planned attempts. Coverage is partial; scores can change as more attempts are decided.
Which is cheaper per task, Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (none) or Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max)?
Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (none), at $0.103 against $0.362 for Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max).
Which is faster per task, Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (none) or Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max)?
Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (none), at 2.9 min against 9.3 min for Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max).
Which has the larger context window, Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (none) or Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max)?
They are level, at 262,144 tokens.

More: Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (none) · Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max) · all comparisons