Axis Spatial

GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning), Terminus-2 vs. Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude Code

GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning), Terminus-2 against Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude Code: Geospatial Agent Index, each evaluation, cost, time and tokens, on the same tasks and limits. The harnesses differ, so part of any gap can come from the harness. Methodology.

Side by side

GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning), Terminus-2 vs. Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude Code
MetricGLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning), Terminus-2Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude Code
Geospatial Agent Index: Text only6370
Geospatial Agent Index: Text + visionNo image input72
Earth-Bench V2 score5862
GeoBenchX score6073
GS-QA2 score7275
Vision agents scoreNo image input77
GeoAgentBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)9292
GeoAnalystBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)74100
OGD4All score (standalone; in no index)No data95
GeoNatureAgent score (standalone; in no index)No data100
MultiGlobeQA score (standalone; in no index)No data72
GeoAgentEval score (standalone; in no index)No data92
Remote sensing and raster analysis score7272
GIS analysis score6573
Climate and time series score5864
Spatial statistics score3138
Making maps score7979
Recognising infeasible requests score4573
Cost per task$0.099$0.0053
Time per task (at 100 output tokens/s)1.5 min0.9 min
Tokens per attempt185k181k
Turns per attempt12.85.5
Input price per 1M tokens$1.40$0.10
Output price per 1M tokens$4.40$0.50
Context window262,1441,000,000
Image inputNoYes
DeveloperZ.aiAnthropic

Charts

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal average of Earth-Bench V2, GeoBenchX and GS-QA2, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

Geospatial Agent IndexScores 0 to 100: Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude Code: 70; GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning), Terminus-2: 63025507510070Claude Haiku 5.5 (low)63GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning)
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
Geospatial Agent Index
ModelDeveloperGeospatial Agent Index
Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude CodeAnthropic70
GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning), Terminus-2Z.ai63

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

Cost per taskCost per task in US dollars: Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude Code: $0.0053; GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning), Terminus-2: $0.099$0$0.025$0.05$0.075$0.10$0.0053Claude Haiku 5.5 (low)$0.099GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning)
Data table: Cost per task
Cost per task
ModelDeveloperCost per task
Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude CodeAnthropic$0.0053
GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning), Terminus-2Z.ai$0.099

Output tokens per task

Average output tokens per attempt, reasoning included · Lower is better

Output tokens per taskOutput tokens per task: Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude Code: 3k; GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning), Terminus-2: 6k02k3k4k6k3kClaude Haiku 5.5 (low)6kGLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning)
Data table: Output tokens per task
Output tokens per task
ModelDeveloperOutput tokens per task
Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude CodeAnthropic3k
GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning), Terminus-2Z.ai6k

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning), Terminus-2 or Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude Code?
Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude Code, 70 to 63.
Which is cheaper per task, GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning), Terminus-2 or Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude Code?
Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude Code, $0.0053 to $0.099.
Which writes fewer output tokens per task, GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning), Terminus-2 or Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude Code?
Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude Code, 3k to 6k.
Which has the larger context window, GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning), Terminus-2 or Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude Code?
Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude Code, 1,000,000 tokens to 262,144 tokens.

More: GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning), Terminus-2 · Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude Code · All comparisons