Axis Spatial

Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max) vs. Terminus-2 – Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning): geospatial agent comparison

Comparison between Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max) and Terminus-2 – Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning) on the Geospatial Agent Index, each benchmark, cost, time and token use, from the same tasks, agent and limits. Methodology.

Side by side

Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max) vs. Terminus-2 – Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning)
MetricTerminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max)Terminus-2 – Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning)
Geospatial Agent Index74* (attempts per task: 1.2)0* (attempts per task: 1 on 9 of 290 tasks so far)
GeoAgentBench score95No data
GeoBenchX score55No data
Earth-Bench score510
GeoAnalystBench score95No data
Raster and remote sensing score730
Vector and overlay score81No data
Networks and routing score100No data
Climate and time series score770
Spatial statistics and interpolation score69No data
Mapping and cartography score72No data
Recognising infeasible requests score37No data
Cost per task$0.359$0.247
Time per task9.6 min15.6 min
Tokens per attempt370k693k
Turns per attempt12.125.7
Attempts decided3389
Input price per 1M tokens$1.40$0.35
Output price per 1M tokens$4.40$0.56
Context window262,144128,000
Image inputNoYes
DeveloperZ.aiMistral AI

Charts

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal-weight average of the evaluation scores, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

  • Partial coverage
Geospatial Agent IndexTerminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max): 74* (partial coverage); Terminus-2 – Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning): 0* (partial coverage)025507510074*GLM-5.2 (max)0*Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning)
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
Geospatial Agent Index
ModelCreatorGeospatial Agent IndexRange while attempts are pendingBenchmarks coveredCoverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max)Z.ai74* (attempts per task: 1.2)74 to 744 of 4338 of 870 planned attempts (1 excluded)
Terminus-2 – Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning)Mistral AI0* (attempts per task: 1 on 9 of 290 tasks so far)No pending judgements; coverage incomplete1 of 49 of 351 planned attempts

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

  • Partial coverage
Cost per taskTerminus-2 – Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning): $0.247 (partial coverage); Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max): $0.359 (partial coverage)$0$0.100$0.200$0.300$0.400$0.247Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning)$0.359GLM-5.2 (max)
Data table: Cost per task
Cost per task
ModelCreatorCost per taskCoverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max)Z.ai$0.359342 of 870 planned attempts (1 excluded)
Terminus-2 – Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning)Mistral AI$0.2479 of 351 planned attempts

Time per task

Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better

  • Partial coverage
Time per taskTerminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max): 9.6 min (partial coverage); Terminus-2 – Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning): 15.6 min (partial coverage)0m4m8m12m17m9.6 minGLM-5.2 (max)15.6 minMistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning)
Data table: Time per task
Time per task
ModelCreatorTime per taskCoverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max)Z.ai9.6 min342 of 870 planned attempts (1 excluded)
Terminus-2 – Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning)Mistral AI15.6 min9 of 351 planned attempts

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max) or Terminus-2 – Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning)?
Not comparable yet: Terminus-2 – Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning) has scores on 1 of 4 benchmarks, so it is not yet ranked. Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max): 338 of 870 planned attempts (1 excluded). Terminus-2 – Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning): 9 of 351 planned attempts. Coverage is partial; scores can change as more attempts are decided.
Which is cheaper per task, Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max) or Terminus-2 – Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning)?
Terminus-2 – Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning), at $0.247 against $0.359 for Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max).
Which is faster per task, Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max) or Terminus-2 – Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning)?
Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max), at 9.6 min against 15.6 min for Terminus-2 – Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning).
Which has the larger context window, Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max) or Terminus-2 – Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning)?
Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max), at 262,144 tokens against 128,000 tokens for Terminus-2 – Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning).

More: Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max) · Terminus-2 – Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning) · all comparisons