Axis Spatial

Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max) vs. Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3 (max, default): geospatial agent comparison

Comparison between Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max) and Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3 (max, default) on the Geospatial Agent Index, each benchmark, cost, time and token use, from the same tasks, agent and limits. Methodology.

Side by side

Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max) vs. Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3 (max, default)
MetricTerminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max)Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3 (max, default)
Geospatial Agent Index75* (partial: 1.1 of 3 attempts)67* (partial: 1.1 of 3 attempts)
GeoAgentBench score9795
GeoBenchX score5552
Earth-Bench score5239
GeoAnalystBench score9584
Raster and remote sensing score7365
Vector and overlay score8175
Networks and routing score10080
Climate and time series score7956
Spatial statistics and interpolation score7567
Mapping and cartography score7266
Recognising infeasible requests score3742
Cost per task$0.362$0.363
Time per task9.3 min10.1 min
Tokens per attempt363k260k
Turns per attempt12.010.5
Attempts decided306310
Input price per 1M tokens$1.40$1.40
Output price per 1M tokens$4.40$4.40
Context window262,1441,048,576
Image inputNoNo
DeveloperZ.aiZ.ai

Charts

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal-weight average of the evaluation scores, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

  • Partial coverage
Geospatial Agent IndexTerminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max): 75* (partial coverage); Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3 (max, default): 67* (partial coverage)025507510075*GLM-5.2 (max)67*GLM-5.3 (max, default)
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
Geospatial Agent Index
ModelCreatorGeospatial Agent IndexRange while attempts are pendingBenchmarks coveredCoverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max)Z.ai75* (partial: 1.1 of 3 attempts)72 to 754 of 4306 of 870 planned attempts
Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3 (max, default)Z.ai67* (partial: 1.1 of 3 attempts)66 to 684 of 4310 of 870 planned attempts

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

  • Partial coverage
Cost per taskTerminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max): $0.362 (partial coverage); Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3 (max, default): $0.363 (partial coverage)$0$0.100$0.200$0.300$0.400$0.362GLM-5.2 (max)$0.363GLM-5.3 (max, default)
Data table: Cost per task
Cost per task
ModelCreatorCost per taskCoverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max)Z.ai$0.362324 of 870 planned attempts
Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3 (max, default)Z.ai$0.363320 of 870 planned attempts

Time per task

Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better

  • Partial coverage
Time per taskTerminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max): 9.3 min (partial coverage); Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3 (max, default): 10.1 min (partial coverage)0m3m7m10m13m9.3 minGLM-5.2 (max)10.1 minGLM-5.3 (max, default)
Data table: Time per task
Time per task
ModelCreatorTime per taskCoverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max)Z.ai9.3 min324 of 870 planned attempts
Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3 (max, default)Z.ai10.1 min320 of 870 planned attempts

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max) or Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3 (max, default)?
Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max), at 75 against 67 for Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3 (max, default). Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max): 306 of 870 planned attempts. Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3 (max, default): 310 of 870 planned attempts. Coverage is partial; scores can change as more attempts are decided.
Which is cheaper per task, Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max) or Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3 (max, default)?
Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max), at $0.362 against $0.363 for Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3 (max, default).
Which is faster per task, Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max) or Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3 (max, default)?
Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max), at 9.3 min against 10.1 min for Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3 (max, default).
Which has the larger context window, Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max) or Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3 (max, default)?
Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3 (max, default), at 1,048,576 tokens against 262,144 tokens for Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max).

More: Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max) · Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3 (max, default) · all comparisons