GLM-5.2 (high), Terminus-2 vs. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2
GLM-5.2 (high), Terminus-2 against Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2: Geospatial Agent Index, each evaluation, cost, time and tokens, on the same tasks and limits. Methodology.
Side by side
| Metric | GLM-5.2 (high), Terminus-2 | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2 |
|---|---|---|
| Geospatial Agent Index: Text only | 71 | 20 |
| Geospatial Agent Index: Text + vision | No image input | No data |
| Earth-Bench V2 score | 68 | 29 |
| GeoBenchX score | 67 | 21 |
| GS-QA2 score | 78 | 9 |
| Vision agents score | No image input | No data |
| GeoAgentBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index) | 94 | 26 |
| GeoAnalystBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index) | 100 | 16 |
| OGD4All score (standalone; in no index) | No data | No data |
| GeoNatureAgent score (standalone; in no index) | No data | No data |
| MultiGlobeQA score (standalone; in no index) | No data | No data |
| GeoAgentEval score (standalone; in no index) | No data | No data |
| Remote sensing and raster analysis score | 77 | 17 |
| GIS analysis score | 79 | 6 |
| Climate and time series score | 68 | 27 |
| Spatial statistics score | 46 | 0 |
| Making maps score | 81 | 16 |
| Recognising infeasible requests score | 53 | 33 |
| Cost per task | $0.22 | $0.13 |
| Time per task (at 100 output tokens/s) | 4.7 min | 4.9 min |
| Tokens per attempt | 325k | 589k |
| Turns per attempt | 12.9 | 30.7 |
| Input price per 1M tokens | $1.40 | $0.20 |
| Output price per 1M tokens | $4.40 | $0.80 |
| Context window | 262,144 | 256,000 |
| Image input | No | Yes |
| Developer | Z.ai | NVIDIA |
Charts
Geospatial Agent Index
Equal average of Earth-Bench V2, GeoBenchX and GS-QA2, 0 to 100 · Higher is better
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
| Model | Developer | Geospatial Agent Index |
|---|---|---|
| GLM-5.2 (high), Terminus-2 | Z.ai | 71 |
| Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2 | NVIDIA | 20 |
Cost per task
Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better
Data table: Cost per task
| Model | Developer | Cost per task |
|---|---|---|
| Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2 | NVIDIA | $0.13 |
| GLM-5.2 (high), Terminus-2 | Z.ai | $0.22 |
Output tokens per task
Average output tokens per attempt, reasoning included · Lower is better
Data table: Output tokens per task
| Model | Developer | Output tokens per task |
|---|---|---|
| GLM-5.2 (high), Terminus-2 | Z.ai | 22k |
| Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2 | NVIDIA | 22k |
Frequently asked questions
Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, GLM-5.2 (high), Terminus-2 or Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2?
GLM-5.2 (high), Terminus-2, 71 to 20.
Which is cheaper per task, GLM-5.2 (high), Terminus-2 or Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2?
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2, $0.13 to $0.22.
Which writes fewer output tokens per task, GLM-5.2 (high), Terminus-2 or Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2?
GLM-5.2 (high), Terminus-2, 22k to 22k.
Which has the larger context window, GLM-5.2 (high), Terminus-2 or Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2?
GLM-5.2 (high), Terminus-2, 262,144 tokens to 256,000 tokens.
More: GLM-5.2 (high), Terminus-2 · Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2 · All comparisons