Axis Spatial

GLM-5.2 (high), Terminus-2 vs. MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2

GLM-5.2 (high), Terminus-2 against MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2: Geospatial Agent Index, each evaluation, cost, time and tokens, on the same tasks and limits. Methodology.

Side by side

GLM-5.2 (high), Terminus-2 vs. MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2
MetricGLM-5.2 (high), Terminus-2MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2
Geospatial Agent Index: Text only7151
Geospatial Agent Index: Text + visionNo image inputNo data
Earth-Bench V2 score6839
GeoBenchX score6742
GS-QA2 score7871
Vision agents scoreNo image inputNo data
GeoAgentBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)9488
GeoAnalystBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)10047
OGD4All score (standalone; in no index)No dataNo data
GeoNatureAgent score (standalone; in no index)No dataNo data
MultiGlobeQA score (standalone; in no index)No dataNo data
GeoAgentEval score (standalone; in no index)No dataNo data
Remote sensing and raster analysis score7757
GIS analysis score7977
Climate and time series score6834
Spatial statistics score4625
Making maps score8157
Recognising infeasible requests score5330
Cost per task$0.22$0.017
Time per task (at 100 output tokens/s)4.7 min8.4 min
Tokens per attempt325k254k
Turns per attempt12.913.2
Input price per 1M tokens$1.40$0.15
Output price per 1M tokens$4.40$0.60
Context window262,1441,000,000
Image inputNoYes
DeveloperZ.aiOther

Charts

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal average of Earth-Bench V2, GeoBenchX and GS-QA2, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

Geospatial Agent IndexScores 0 to 100: GLM-5.2 (high), Terminus-2: 71; MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2: 51025507510071GLM-5.2 (high)51MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max)
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
Geospatial Agent Index
ModelDeveloperGeospatial Agent Index
GLM-5.2 (high), Terminus-2Z.ai71
MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2Other51

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

Cost per taskCost per task in US dollars: MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2: $0.017; GLM-5.2 (high), Terminus-2: $0.22$0$0.10$0.20$0.30$0.40$0.017MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max)$0.22GLM-5.2 (high)
Data table: Cost per task
Cost per task
ModelDeveloperCost per task
MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2Other$0.017
GLM-5.2 (high), Terminus-2Z.ai$0.22

Output tokens per task

Average output tokens per attempt, reasoning included · Lower is better

Output tokens per taskOutput tokens per task: MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2: 18k; GLM-5.2 (high), Terminus-2: 22k010k20k30k40k18kMiniMax M3.1 Flash (max)22kGLM-5.2 (high)
Data table: Output tokens per task
Output tokens per task
ModelDeveloperOutput tokens per task
MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2Other18k
GLM-5.2 (high), Terminus-2Z.ai22k

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, GLM-5.2 (high), Terminus-2 or MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2?
GLM-5.2 (high), Terminus-2, 71 to 51.
Which is cheaper per task, GLM-5.2 (high), Terminus-2 or MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2?
MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2, $0.017 to $0.22.
Which writes fewer output tokens per task, GLM-5.2 (high), Terminus-2 or MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2?
MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2, 18k to 22k.
Which has the larger context window, GLM-5.2 (high), Terminus-2 or MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2?
MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2, 1,000,000 tokens to 262,144 tokens.

More: GLM-5.2 (high), Terminus-2 · MiniMax M3.1 Flash (max), Terminus-2 · All comparisons