Axis Spatial

Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (high) vs. Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (none): geospatial agent comparison

Comparison between Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (high) and Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (none) on the Geospatial Agent Index, each benchmark, cost, time and token use, from the same tasks, agent and limits. Methodology.

Side by side

Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (high) vs. Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (none)
MetricTerminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (high)Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (none)
Geospatial Agent Index71* (partial: 1 of 3 attempts)69* (partial: 1.4 of 3 attempts)
GeoAgentBench score9694
GeoBenchX score5251
Earth-Bench score3651
GeoAnalystBench score10079
Raster and remote sensing score6873
Vector and overlay score8169
Networks and routing score100100
Climate and time series score6158
Spatial statistics and interpolation score5958
Mapping and cartography score6875
Recognising infeasible requests score4033
Cost per task$0.239$0.103
Time per task5.8 min2.9 min
Tokens per attempt329k169k
Turns per attempt12.111.3
Attempts decided273356
Input price per 1M tokens$1.40$1.40
Output price per 1M tokens$4.40$4.40
Context window262,144262,144
Image inputNoNo
DeveloperZ.aiZ.ai

Charts

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal-weight average of the evaluation scores, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

  • Partial coverage
Geospatial Agent IndexTerminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (high): 71* (partial coverage); Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (none): 69* (partial coverage)025507510071*GLM-5.2 (high)69*GLM-5.2 (none)
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
Geospatial Agent Index
ModelCreatorGeospatial Agent IndexRange while attempts are pendingBenchmarks coveredCoverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (high)Z.ai71* (partial: 1 of 3 attempts)65 to 724 of 4273 of 290 planned attempts
Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (none)Z.ai69* (partial: 1.4 of 3 attempts)62 to 724 of 4356 of 870 planned attempts

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

  • Partial coverage
Cost per taskTerminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (none): $0.103 (partial coverage); Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (high): $0.239$0$0.062$0.125$0.188$0.250$0.103GLM-5.2 (none)$0.239GLM-5.2 (high)
Data table: Cost per task
Cost per task
ModelCreatorCost per taskCoverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (high)Z.ai$0.239290 of 290 planned attempts
Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (none)Z.ai$0.103408 of 870 planned attempts

Time per task

Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better

  • Partial coverage
Time per taskTerminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (none): 2.9 min (partial coverage); Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (high): 5.8 min0m2m3m5m7m2.9 minGLM-5.2 (none)5.8 minGLM-5.2 (high)
Data table: Time per task
Time per task
ModelCreatorTime per taskCoverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (high)Z.ai5.8 min290 of 290 planned attempts
Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (none)Z.ai2.9 min408 of 870 planned attempts

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (high) or Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (none)?
Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (high), at 71 against 69 for Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (none). Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (high): 273 of 290 planned attempts. Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (none): 356 of 870 planned attempts. Coverage is partial; scores can change as more attempts are decided.
Which is cheaper per task, Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (high) or Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (none)?
Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (none), at $0.103 against $0.239 for Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (high).
Which is faster per task, Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (high) or Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (none)?
Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (none), at 2.9 min against 5.8 min for Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (high).
Which has the larger context window, Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (high) or Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (none)?
They are level, at 262,144 tokens.

More: Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (high) · Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (none) · all comparisons