Axis Spatial

Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (high) vs. Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max): geospatial agent comparison

Comparison between Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (high) and Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max) on the Geospatial Agent Index, each benchmark, cost, time and token use, from the same tasks, agent and limits. Methodology.

Side by side

Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (high) vs. Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max)
MetricTerminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (high)Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max)
Geospatial Agent Index71* (partial: 1 of 3 attempts)75* (partial: 1.1 of 3 attempts)
GeoAgentBench score9697
GeoBenchX score5255
Earth-Bench score3652
GeoAnalystBench score10095
Raster and remote sensing score6873
Vector and overlay score8181
Networks and routing score100100
Climate and time series score6179
Spatial statistics and interpolation score5975
Mapping and cartography score6872
Recognising infeasible requests score4037
Cost per task$0.239$0.362
Time per task5.8 min9.3 min
Tokens per attempt329k363k
Turns per attempt12.112.0
Attempts decided273306
Input price per 1M tokens$1.40$1.40
Output price per 1M tokens$4.40$4.40
Context window262,144262,144
Image inputNoNo
DeveloperZ.aiZ.ai

Charts

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal-weight average of the evaluation scores, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

  • Partial coverage
Geospatial Agent IndexTerminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max): 75* (partial coverage); Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (high): 71* (partial coverage)025507510075*GLM-5.2 (max)71*GLM-5.2 (high)
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
Geospatial Agent Index
ModelCreatorGeospatial Agent IndexRange while attempts are pendingBenchmarks coveredCoverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max)Z.ai75* (partial: 1.1 of 3 attempts)72 to 754 of 4306 of 870 planned attempts
Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (high)Z.ai71* (partial: 1 of 3 attempts)65 to 724 of 4273 of 290 planned attempts

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

  • Partial coverage
Cost per taskTerminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (high): $0.239; Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max): $0.362 (partial coverage)$0$0.100$0.200$0.300$0.400$0.239GLM-5.2 (high)$0.362GLM-5.2 (max)
Data table: Cost per task
Cost per task
ModelCreatorCost per taskCoverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (high)Z.ai$0.239290 of 290 planned attempts
Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max)Z.ai$0.362324 of 870 planned attempts

Time per task

Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better

  • Partial coverage
Time per taskTerminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (high): 5.8 min; Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max): 9.3 min (partial coverage)0m2m5m8m10m5.8 minGLM-5.2 (high)9.3 minGLM-5.2 (max)
Data table: Time per task
Time per task
ModelCreatorTime per taskCoverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (high)Z.ai5.8 min290 of 290 planned attempts
Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max)Z.ai9.3 min324 of 870 planned attempts

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (high) or Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max)?
Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max), at 75 against 71 for Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (high). Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (high): 273 of 290 planned attempts. Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max): 306 of 870 planned attempts. Coverage is partial; scores can change as more attempts are decided.
Which is cheaper per task, Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (high) or Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max)?
Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (high), at $0.239 against $0.362 for Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max).
Which is faster per task, Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (high) or Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max)?
Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (high), at 5.8 min against 9.3 min for Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max).
Which has the larger context window, Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (high) or Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max)?
They are level, at 262,144 tokens.

More: Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (high) · Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max) · all comparisons