Axis Spatial

Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on) vs. Terminus-2 – Kimi K3 (always on): geospatial agent comparison

Comparison between Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on) and Terminus-2 – Kimi K3 (always on) on the Geospatial Agent Index, each benchmark, cost, time and token use, from the same tasks, agent and limits. Methodology.

Side by side

Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on) vs. Terminus-2 – Kimi K3 (always on)
MetricTerminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on)Terminus-2 – Kimi K3 (always on)
Geospatial Agent Index29*58*
Earth-Bench V2 score2561
GeoBenchX score3255
GeoAgentBench score (guided GIS workflow; outside the index)3894
GeoAnalystBench score (guided GIS workflow; outside the index)3789
Raster and remote sensing score2659
Vector and overlay score5033
Networks and routing scoreNo dataNo data
Climate and time series score2666
Spatial statistics and interpolation score050
Mapping and cartography score3778
Recognising infeasible requests score3338
Cost per task$0.035$0.336
Time per task11.1 min3.9 min
Tokens per attempt484k76k
Turns per attempt18.87.7
Attempts decided320320
Input price per 1M tokens$0.06$3.00
Output price per 1M tokens$0.40$15.00
Context window131,0721,000,000
Image inputNoYes
DeveloperZ.aiMoonshot AI

Charts

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal-weight average of the evaluation scores, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

  • Planned attempts still to come
Geospatial Agent IndexTerminus-2 – Kimi K3 (always on): 58* (partial coverage); Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on): 29* (partial coverage)025507510058*Kimi K3 (always on)29*GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on)
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
Geospatial Agent Index
ModelCreatorGeospatial Agent IndexRange while attempts are pendingBenchmarks coveredCoverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – Kimi K3 (always on)Moonshot AI58*No pending judgements; coverage incomplete; 1 trace review declined by the judge2 of 2320 of 614 planned attempts
Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on)Z.ai29*No pending judgements; coverage incomplete2 of 2320 of 614 planned attempts

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

  • Planned attempts still to come
Cost per taskTerminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on): $0.035 (partial coverage); Terminus-2 – Kimi K3 (always on): $0.336 (partial coverage)$0$0.100$0.200$0.300$0.400$0.035GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on)$0.336Kimi K3 (always on)
Data table: Cost per task
Cost per task
ModelCreatorCost per taskCoverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on)Z.ai$0.035320 of 614 planned attempts
Terminus-2 – Kimi K3 (always on)Moonshot AI$0.336320 of 614 planned attempts

Time per task

Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better

  • Planned attempts still to come
Time per taskTerminus-2 – Kimi K3 (always on): 3.9 min (partial coverage); Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on): 11.1 min (partial coverage)0m3m7m10m13m3.9 minKimi K3 (always on)11.1 minGLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on)
Data table: Time per task
Time per task
ModelCreatorTime per taskCoverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on)Z.ai11.1 min320 of 614 planned attempts
Terminus-2 – Kimi K3 (always on)Moonshot AI3.9 min320 of 614 planned attempts

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on) or Terminus-2 – Kimi K3 (always on)?
Terminus-2 – Kimi K3 (always on), at 58 against 29 for Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on). Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on): 320 of 614 planned attempts. Terminus-2 – Kimi K3 (always on): 320 of 614 planned attempts. Coverage is partial; scores can change as more attempts are decided.
Which is cheaper per task, Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on) or Terminus-2 – Kimi K3 (always on)?
Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on), at $0.035 against $0.336 for Terminus-2 – Kimi K3 (always on).
Which is faster per task, Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on) or Terminus-2 – Kimi K3 (always on)?
Terminus-2 – Kimi K3 (always on), at 3.9 min against 11.1 min for Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on).
Which has the larger context window, Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on) or Terminus-2 – Kimi K3 (always on)?
Terminus-2 – Kimi K3 (always on), at 1,000,000 tokens against 131,072 tokens for Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on).

More: Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on) · Terminus-2 – Kimi K3 (always on) · all comparisons