Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on) or Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (xhigh)?

Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (xhigh), at 74 against 40 for Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on). Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on): 870 of 870 planned attempts. Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (xhigh): 290 of 290 planned attempts.

Which is cheaper per task, Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on) or Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (xhigh)?

Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on), at $0.030 against $0.163 for Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (xhigh).

Which is faster per task, Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on) or Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (xhigh)?

Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (xhigh), at 1.4 min against 9.2 min for Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on).

Which has the larger context window, Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on) or Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (xhigh)?

Not known yet: Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (xhigh) has no context window data.

Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on) vs. Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (xhigh): geospatial agent comparison

Comparison between Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on) and Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (xhigh) on the Geospatial Agent Index, each benchmark, cost, time and token use, from the same tasks, agent and limits. Methodology.

Side by side

Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on) vs. Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (xhigh)
Metric	Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on)	Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (xhigh)
Geospatial Agent Index	40	74 (partial: 1 of 3 attempts)
GeoAgentBench score	43	94
GeoBenchX score	39	65
Earth-Bench score	35	48
GeoAnalystBench score	42	89
Raster and remote sensing score	36	71
Vector and overlay score	46	67
Networks and routing score	33	100
Climate and time series score	44	71
Spatial statistics and interpolation score	29	58
Mapping and cartography score	50	75
Recognising infeasible requests score	33	63
Cost per task	$0.030	$0.163
Time per task	9.2 min	1.4 min
Tokens per attempt	419k	217k
Turns per attempt	17.9	7.9
Attempts decided	870	290
Input price per 1M tokens	$0.06	$2.00
Output price per 1M tokens	$0.40	$10.00
Context window	131,072	No data
Image input	No	No data
Developer	Z.ai	Anthropic

Charts

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal-weight average of the evaluation scores, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

Data table: Geospatial Agent Index

Geospatial Agent Index
Model	Creator	Geospatial Agent Index	Range while attempts are pending	Benchmarks covered	Coverage (attempts)
Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (xhigh)	Anthropic	74 (partial: 1 of 3 attempts)	No pending judgements	4 of 4	290 of 290 planned attempts
Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on)	Z.ai	40	No pending judgements	4 of 4	870 of 870 planned attempts

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

Data table: Cost per task

Cost per task
Model	Creator	Cost per task	Coverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on)	Z.ai	$0.030	870 of 870 planned attempts
Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (xhigh)	Anthropic	$0.163	290 of 290 planned attempts

Time per task

Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better

Data table: Time per task

Time per task
Model	Creator	Time per task	Coverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on)	Z.ai	9.2 min	870 of 870 planned attempts
Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (xhigh)	Anthropic	1.4 min	290 of 290 planned attempts

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on) or Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (xhigh)?: Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (xhigh), at 74 against 40 for Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on). Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on): 870 of 870 planned attempts. Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (xhigh): 290 of 290 planned attempts.
Which is cheaper per task, Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on) or Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (xhigh)?: Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on), at $0.030 against $0.163 for Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (xhigh).
Which is faster per task, Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on) or Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (xhigh)?: Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (xhigh), at 1.4 min against 9.2 min for Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on).
Which has the larger context window, Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on) or Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (xhigh)?: Not known yet: Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (xhigh) has no context window data.

More: Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on) · Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (xhigh) · all comparisons