Axis Spatial

Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on) vs. Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high): geospatial agent comparison

Comparison between Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on) and Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high) on the Geospatial Agent Index, each benchmark, cost, time and token use, from the same tasks, agent and limits. Methodology.

Side by side

Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on) vs. Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high)
MetricTerminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on)Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high)
Geospatial Agent Index4081* (partial: 1.9 of 3 attempts)
GeoAgentBench score43100
GeoBenchX score3967
Earth-Bench score3558
GeoAnalystBench score4297
Raster and remote sensing score3679
Vector and overlay score4681
Networks and routing score33100
Climate and time series score4479
Spatial statistics and interpolation score2973
Mapping and cartography score5076
Recognising infeasible requests score3361
Cost per task$0.030$0.062
Time per task9.2 min0.7 min
Tokens per attempt419k95k
Turns per attempt17.94.6
Attempts decided870479
Input price per 1M tokens$0.06$2.00
Output price per 1M tokens$0.40$10.00
Context window131,072No data
Image inputNoNo data
DeveloperZ.aiAnthropic

Charts

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal-weight average of the evaluation scores, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

  • Partial coverage
Geospatial Agent IndexClaude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high): 81* (partial coverage); Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on): 40025507510081*Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high)40GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on)
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
Geospatial Agent Index
ModelCreatorGeospatial Agent IndexRange while attempts are pendingBenchmarks coveredCoverage (attempts)
Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high)Anthropic81* (partial: 1.9 of 3 attempts)71 to 824 of 4479 of 870 planned attempts (236 excluded)
Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on)Z.ai40No pending judgements4 of 4870 of 870 planned attempts

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

  • Partial coverage
Cost per taskTerminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on): $0.030; Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high): $0.062 (partial coverage)$0$0.020$0.040$0.060$0.080$0.030GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on)$0.062Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high)
Data table: Cost per task
Cost per task
ModelCreatorCost per taskCoverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on)Z.ai$0.030870 of 870 planned attempts
Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high)Anthropic$0.062543 of 870 planned attempts (236 excluded)

Time per task

Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better

  • Partial coverage
Time per taskClaude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high): 0.7 min (partial coverage); Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on): 9.2 min0m2m5m8m10m0.7 minClaude Sonnet 5.5 (high)9.2 minGLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on)
Data table: Time per task
Time per task
ModelCreatorTime per taskCoverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on)Z.ai9.2 min870 of 870 planned attempts
Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high)Anthropic0.7 min543 of 870 planned attempts (236 excluded)

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on) or Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high)?
Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high), at 81 against 40 for Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on). Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on): 870 of 870 planned attempts. Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high): 479 of 870 planned attempts (236 excluded). Coverage is partial; scores can change as more attempts are decided.
Which is cheaper per task, Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on) or Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high)?
Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on), at $0.030 against $0.062 for Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high).
Which is faster per task, Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on) or Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high)?
Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high), at 0.7 min against 9.2 min for Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on).
Which has the larger context window, Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on) or Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high)?
Not known yet: Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high) has no context window data.

More: Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on) · Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high) · all comparisons