Axis Spatial

Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning), Terminus-2 vs. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2

Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning), Terminus-2 against Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2: Geospatial Agent Index, each evaluation, cost, time and tokens, on the same tasks and limits. Methodology.

Side by side

Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning), Terminus-2 vs. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2
MetricGemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning), Terminus-2Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2
Geospatial Agent Index: Text only5620
Geospatial Agent Index: Text + visionNo dataNo data
Earth-Bench V2 score4629
GeoBenchX score6321
GS-QA2 score589
Vision agents scoreNo dataNo data
GeoAgentBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)8626
GeoAnalystBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)6316
OGD4All score (standalone; in no index)No dataNo data
GeoNatureAgent score (standalone; in no index)No dataNo data
MultiGlobeQA score (standalone; in no index)No dataNo data
GeoAgentEval score (standalone; in no index)No dataNo data
Remote sensing and raster analysis score5917
GIS analysis score576
Climate and time series score4727
Spatial statistics score310
Making maps score7016
Recognising infeasible requests score6333
Cost per task$0.021$0.13
Time per task (at 100 output tokens/s)5.6 min4.9 min
Tokens per attempt168k589k
Turns per attempt14.630.7
Input price per 1M tokens$0.10$0.20
Output price per 1M tokens$0.30$0.80
Context window256,000256,000
Image inputYesYes
DeveloperGoogleNVIDIA

Charts

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal average of Earth-Bench V2, GeoBenchX and GS-QA2, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

Geospatial Agent IndexScores 0 to 100: Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning), Terminus-2: 56; Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2: 20025507510056Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning)20Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning)
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
Geospatial Agent Index
ModelDeveloperGeospatial Agent Index
Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning), Terminus-2Google56
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2NVIDIA20

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

Cost per taskCost per task in US dollars: Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning), Terminus-2: $0.021; Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2: $0.13$0$0.05$0.10$0.15$0.20$0.021Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning)$0.13Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning)
Data table: Cost per task
Cost per task
ModelDeveloperCost per task
Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning), Terminus-2Google$0.021
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2NVIDIA$0.13

Output tokens per task

Average output tokens per attempt, reasoning included · Lower is better

Output tokens per taskOutput tokens per task: Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning), Terminus-2: 21k; Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2: 22k010k20k30k40k21kGemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning)22kNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning)
Data table: Output tokens per task
Output tokens per task
ModelDeveloperOutput tokens per task
Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning), Terminus-2Google21k
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2NVIDIA22k

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning), Terminus-2 or Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2?
Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning), Terminus-2, 56 to 20.
Which is cheaper per task, Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning), Terminus-2 or Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2?
Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning), Terminus-2, $0.021 to $0.13.
Which writes fewer output tokens per task, Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning), Terminus-2 or Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2?
Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning), Terminus-2, 21k to 22k.
Which has the larger context window, Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning), Terminus-2 or Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2?
They are level, at 256,000 tokens.

More: Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning), Terminus-2 · Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2 · All comparisons