Terminus-2 – Gemma 4 26B A4B (thinking on) vs. Terminus-2 – Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning): geospatial agent comparison
Comparison between Terminus-2 – Gemma 4 26B A4B (thinking on) and Terminus-2 – Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning) on the Geospatial Agent Index, each benchmark, cost, time and token use, from the same tasks, agent and limits. Methodology.
Side by side
| Metric | Terminus-2 – Gemma 4 26B A4B (thinking on) | Terminus-2 – Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Geospatial Agent Index | 62 (attempts per task: 3) | 0* (attempts per task: 1 on 9 of 290 tasks so far) |
| GeoAgentBench score | 87 | No data |
| GeoBenchX score | 53 | No data |
| Earth-Bench score | 34 | 0 |
| GeoAnalystBench score | 72 | No data |
| Raster and remote sensing score | 57 | 0 |
| Vector and overlay score | 74 | No data |
| Networks and routing score | 87 | No data |
| Climate and time series score | 50 | 0 |
| Spatial statistics and interpolation score | 57 | No data |
| Mapping and cartography score | 71 | No data |
| Recognising infeasible requests score | 43 | No data |
| Cost per task | $0.016 | $0.247 |
| Time per task | 7.0 min | 15.6 min |
| Tokens per attempt | 127k | 693k |
| Turns per attempt | 9.9 | 25.7 |
| Attempts decided | 870 | 9 |
| Input price per 1M tokens | $0.10 | $0.35 |
| Output price per 1M tokens | $0.30 | $0.56 |
| Context window | 256,000 | 128,000 |
| Image input | Yes | Yes |
| Developer | Mistral AI |
Charts
Geospatial Agent Index
Equal-weight average of the evaluation scores, 0 to 100 · Higher is better
First eight selected entries in metric order. Full results in table view.
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
| Model | Creator | Geospatial Agent Index | Range while attempts are pending | Benchmarks covered | Coverage (attempts) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Terminus-2 – Gemma 4 26B A4B (thinking on) | 62 (attempts per task: 3) | No pending judgements | 4 of 4 | 870 of 870 planned attempts | |
| Terminus-2 – Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning) | Mistral AI | 0* (attempts per task: 1 on 9 of 290 tasks so far) | No pending judgements; coverage incomplete | 1 of 4 | 9 of 351 planned attempts |
Terminus-2 – Gemma 4 26B A4B (thinking on)Cost per task
Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better
First eight selected entries in metric order. Full results in table view.
Data table: Cost per task
| Model | Creator | Cost per task | Coverage (attempts) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terminus-2 – Gemma 4 26B A4B (thinking on) | $0.016 | 870 of 870 planned attempts | |
| Terminus-2 – Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning) | Mistral AI | $0.247 | 9 of 351 planned attempts |
Time per task
Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better
First eight selected entries in metric order. Full results in table view.
Data table: Time per task
| Model | Creator | Time per task | Coverage (attempts) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terminus-2 – Gemma 4 26B A4B (thinking on) | 7.0 min | 870 of 870 planned attempts | |
| Terminus-2 – Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning) | Mistral AI | 15.6 min | 9 of 351 planned attempts |
Frequently asked questions
- Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Terminus-2 – Gemma 4 26B A4B (thinking on) or Terminus-2 – Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning)?
- Not comparable yet: Terminus-2 – Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning) has scores on 1 of 4 benchmarks, so it is not yet ranked. Terminus-2 – Gemma 4 26B A4B (thinking on): 870 of 870 planned attempts. Terminus-2 – Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning): 9 of 351 planned attempts. Coverage is partial; scores can change as more attempts are decided.
- Which is cheaper per task, Terminus-2 – Gemma 4 26B A4B (thinking on) or Terminus-2 – Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning)?
- Terminus-2 – Gemma 4 26B A4B (thinking on), at $0.016 against $0.247 for Terminus-2 – Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning).
- Which is faster per task, Terminus-2 – Gemma 4 26B A4B (thinking on) or Terminus-2 – Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning)?
- Terminus-2 – Gemma 4 26B A4B (thinking on), at 7.0 min against 15.6 min for Terminus-2 – Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning).
- Which has the larger context window, Terminus-2 – Gemma 4 26B A4B (thinking on) or Terminus-2 – Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning)?
- Terminus-2 – Gemma 4 26B A4B (thinking on), at 256,000 tokens against 128,000 tokens for Terminus-2 – Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning).
More: Terminus-2 – Gemma 4 26B A4B (thinking on) · Terminus-2 – Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning) · all comparisons