Axis Spatial

Terminus-2 – Gemma 4 26B A4B (thinking on) vs. Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium): geospatial agent comparison

Comparison between Terminus-2 – Gemma 4 26B A4B (thinking on) and Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium) on the Geospatial Agent Index, each benchmark, cost, time and token use, from the same tasks, agent and limits. Methodology.

Side by side

Terminus-2 – Gemma 4 26B A4B (thinking on) vs. Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium)
MetricTerminus-2 – Gemma 4 26B A4B (thinking on)Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium)
Geospatial Agent Index6277* (partial: 2 of 3 attempts)
GeoAgentBench score8798
GeoBenchX score5366
Earth-Bench score3445
GeoAnalystBench score7297
Raster and remote sensing score5770
Vector and overlay score7481
Networks and routing score87100
Climate and time series score5065
Spatial statistics and interpolation score5779
Mapping and cartography score7178
Recognising infeasible requests score4359
Cost per task$0.016$0.052
Time per task7.0 min0.6 min
Tokens per attempt127k72k
Turns per attempt9.93.7
Attempts decided870500
Input price per 1M tokens$0.10$2.00
Output price per 1M tokens$0.30$10.00
Context window256,000No data
Image inputYesNo data
DeveloperGoogleAnthropic

Charts

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal-weight average of the evaluation scores, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

  • Partial coverage
Geospatial Agent IndexClaude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium): 77* (partial coverage); Terminus-2 – Gemma 4 26B A4B (thinking on): 62025507510077*Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium)62Gemma 4 26B A4B (thinking on)
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
Geospatial Agent Index
ModelCreatorGeospatial Agent IndexRange while attempts are pendingBenchmarks coveredCoverage (attempts)
Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium)Anthropic77* (partial: 2 of 3 attempts)67 to 774 of 4500 of 870 planned attempts (229 excluded)
Terminus-2 – Gemma 4 26B A4B (thinking on)Google62No pending judgements4 of 4870 of 870 planned attempts

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

  • Partial coverage
Cost per taskTerminus-2 – Gemma 4 26B A4B (thinking on): $0.016; Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium): $0.052 (partial coverage)$0$0.015$0.030$0.045$0.060$0.016Gemma 4 26B A4B (thinking on)$0.052Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium)
Data table: Cost per task
Cost per task
ModelCreatorCost per taskCoverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – Gemma 4 26B A4B (thinking on)Google$0.016870 of 870 planned attempts
Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium)Anthropic$0.052568 of 870 planned attempts (229 excluded)

Time per task

Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better

  • Partial coverage
Time per taskClaude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium): 0.6 min (partial coverage); Terminus-2 – Gemma 4 26B A4B (thinking on): 7.0 min0m2m4m6m8m0.6 minClaude Sonnet 5.5 (medium)7.0 minGemma 4 26B A4B (thinking on)
Data table: Time per task
Time per task
ModelCreatorTime per taskCoverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – Gemma 4 26B A4B (thinking on)Google7.0 min870 of 870 planned attempts
Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium)Anthropic0.6 min568 of 870 planned attempts (229 excluded)

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Terminus-2 – Gemma 4 26B A4B (thinking on) or Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium)?
Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium), at 77 against 62 for Terminus-2 – Gemma 4 26B A4B (thinking on). Terminus-2 – Gemma 4 26B A4B (thinking on): 870 of 870 planned attempts. Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium): 500 of 870 planned attempts (229 excluded). Coverage is partial; scores can change as more attempts are decided.
Which is cheaper per task, Terminus-2 – Gemma 4 26B A4B (thinking on) or Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium)?
Terminus-2 – Gemma 4 26B A4B (thinking on), at $0.016 against $0.052 for Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium).
Which is faster per task, Terminus-2 – Gemma 4 26B A4B (thinking on) or Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium)?
Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium), at 0.6 min against 7.0 min for Terminus-2 – Gemma 4 26B A4B (thinking on).
Which has the larger context window, Terminus-2 – Gemma 4 26B A4B (thinking on) or Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium)?
Not known yet: Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium) has no context window data.

More: Terminus-2 – Gemma 4 26B A4B (thinking on) · Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium) · all comparisons