Axis Spatial

Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (low) vs. Terminus-2 – Kimi K2.7 Code (always on): geospatial agent comparison

Comparison between Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (low) and Terminus-2 – Kimi K2.7 Code (always on) on the Geospatial Agent Index, each benchmark, cost, time and token use, from the same tasks, agent and limits. Methodology.

Side by side

Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (low) vs. Terminus-2 – Kimi K2.7 Code (always on)
MetricTerminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (low)Terminus-2 – Kimi K2.7 Code (always on)
Geospatial Agent Index64* (attempts per task: 2.9)68* (attempts per task: 3.7)
GeoAgentBench score9686
GeoBenchX score6149
Earth-Bench score3748
GeoAnalystBench score6389
Raster and remote sensing score6256
Vector and overlay score6372
Networks and routing score10080
Climate and time series score5157
Spatial statistics and interpolation score4342
Mapping and cartography score5365
Recognising infeasible requests score8343
Cost per task$0.115$0.142
Time per task2.7 min7.6 min
Tokens per attempt314k360k
Turns per attempt17.915.3
Attempts decided833496
Input price per 1M tokens$0.75$0.95
Output price per 1M tokens$3.75$4.00
Context window1,048,576262,144
Image inputYesYes
DeveloperGoogleMoonshot AI

Charts

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal-weight average of the evaluation scores, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

  • Partial coverage
Geospatial Agent IndexTerminus-2 – Kimi K2.7 Code (always on): 68* (partial coverage); Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (low): 64* (partial coverage)025507510068*Kimi K2.7 Code (always on)64*Gemini 3.8 Flash (low)
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
Geospatial Agent Index
ModelCreatorGeospatial Agent IndexRange while attempts are pendingBenchmarks coveredCoverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – Kimi K2.7 Code (always on)Moonshot AI68* (attempts per task: 3.7)28 to 834 of 4496 of 1,167 planned attempts
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (low)Google64* (attempts per task: 2.9)No pending judgements; coverage incomplete4 of 4833 of 1,167 planned attempts (74 excluded)

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

  • Partial coverage
Cost per taskTerminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (low): $0.115 (partial coverage); Terminus-2 – Kimi K2.7 Code (always on): $0.142 (partial coverage)$0$0.038$0.075$0.113$0.150$0.115Gemini 3.8 Flash (low)$0.142Kimi K2.7 Code (always on)
Data table: Cost per task
Cost per task
ModelCreatorCost per taskCoverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (low)Google$0.115833 of 1,167 planned attempts (74 excluded)
Terminus-2 – Kimi K2.7 Code (always on)Moonshot AI$0.1421,065 of 1,167 planned attempts

Time per task

Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better

  • Partial coverage
Time per taskTerminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (low): 2.7 min (partial coverage); Terminus-2 – Kimi K2.7 Code (always on): 7.6 min (partial coverage)0m2m4m6m8m2.7 minGemini 3.8 Flash (low)7.6 minKimi K2.7 Code (always on)
Data table: Time per task
Time per task
ModelCreatorTime per taskCoverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (low)Google2.7 min833 of 1,167 planned attempts (74 excluded)
Terminus-2 – Kimi K2.7 Code (always on)Moonshot AI7.6 min1,065 of 1,167 planned attempts

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (low) or Terminus-2 – Kimi K2.7 Code (always on)?
Terminus-2 – Kimi K2.7 Code (always on), at 68 against 64 for Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (low). Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (low): 833 of 1,167 planned attempts (74 excluded). Terminus-2 – Kimi K2.7 Code (always on): 496 of 1,167 planned attempts. Coverage is partial; scores can change as more attempts are decided.
Which is cheaper per task, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (low) or Terminus-2 – Kimi K2.7 Code (always on)?
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (low), at $0.115 against $0.142 for Terminus-2 – Kimi K2.7 Code (always on).
Which is faster per task, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (low) or Terminus-2 – Kimi K2.7 Code (always on)?
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (low), at 2.7 min against 7.6 min for Terminus-2 – Kimi K2.7 Code (always on).
Which has the larger context window, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (low) or Terminus-2 – Kimi K2.7 Code (always on)?
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (low), at 1,048,576 tokens against 262,144 tokens for Terminus-2 – Kimi K2.7 Code (always on).

More: Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (low) · Terminus-2 – Kimi K2.7 Code (always on) · all comparisons